I thought that was already the case in multiple jurisdictions.baldeagle wrote: If we know that BAC changes at the rate of 2% per hour and it takes four hours to get the warrant and take the sample, can't the DA argue in court that the true BAC is 8% higher than the measured BAC? After all, it's scientifically valid.
Search found 1 match
Return to “SCOTUS rules against warrantless DWI blood draws”
- Thu Apr 18, 2013 9:56 pm
- Forum: Off-Topic
- Topic: SCOTUS rules against warrantless DWI blood draws
- Replies: 12
- Views: 2165