TexasCHLforum.com

Ok thanks that's what I thought! It's a shame

So in our new laws that went in afect today! The one On the legal posting of the 30.06 sign!! I guess it failed ?

Rusty Wrenches wrote:
City of Pearland public works building. Don't think they can put one up and the letters are way too small.


Dunno about "public works "

30.05 ...

http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/D" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false; ... /PE.30.htm
(7) "Critical infrastructure facility" means one of the following, if completely enclosed by a fence or other physical barrier that is obviously designed to exclude intruders:

(A) a chemical manufacturing facility;

(B) a refinery;

(C) an electrical power generating facility, substation, switching station, electrical control center, or electrical transmission or distribution facility;

(D) a water intake structure, water treatment facility, wastewater treatment plant, or pump station;

(E) a natural gas transmission compressor station;

(F) a liquid natural gas terminal or storage facility;

(G) a telecommunications central switching office;

(H) a port, railroad switching yard, trucking terminal, or other freight transportation facility;

(I) a gas processing plant, including a plant used in the processing, treatment, or fractionation of natural gas; or

(J) a transmission facility used by a federally licensed radio or television station.
...

IF "Public Works" is a critical Infrastructure Facility ... under 30.05, and it's a defense under 30.05 trespassing for chls if the basis was them carrying ...


(f) It is a defense to prosecution under this section that:

(1) the basis on which entry on the property or land or in the building was forbidden is that entry with a handgun was forbidden; and

(2) the person was carrying a concealed handgun and a license issued under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code, to carry a concealed handgun of the same category the person was carrying.

perhaps they just wanted to provide the defense to prosecution to 30.05 for CHLs only, which would be easier to show there with a non-enforceable 30.06 sign ? but without the sign, it'd be trespassing under 30.05 without the defense? ...
============================================================

Oddly, it seems that's a way to "benefit" CHLs by placing an unenforceable 30.06 sign to provide a defense under 30.06


Now I'm !!! What can they legally post and inforce ??? The city I work for has the proper 30.06 posted at all entrance's to property, parking lot buildings,,, the works !! Publick works yard , water plant ,& waist water plants,,,plus City Hall an all other buildings!! And the 30.05 signe does are does not apply to us if they changed theme???

Yep it's bull!!!! If they don't meet the criteria to post the signs if their is one ?? I wish that they could be informed of that!!! And made to take it down ! Because it's very wierd that people say that some of the signes or not leagley posted an u can walk past theme!!! But we where taught if it was a proper signe it was a no go!!! Are was I not a very good student lol.

Our city has it on the office buildings and now has put on the entrance's into the yard were we park!!! 30 06 signes !!!
Is it legalese or not???? Don't won't to get fired but won't the right to have in my car!!!! Need the laws on it to protect my job if what their doing is wrong!!!