Well Chas, you always want to strive to be right 99.99% of the time...No prob...Keeps the wallet fat...
I also didn't see much of anything else than that mandated "study" as well...
That study more than likely will be evaluated and spun to fit an anti-slant anyway...So inevitably its going to be a waste of our money that will create yet another attack on our rights...
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Is S. 397 a Trojan Horse?”
- Wed Aug 10, 2005 1:06 pm
- Forum: Federal
- Topic: Is S. 397 a Trojan Horse?
- Replies: 13
- Views: 3750
- Wed Aug 10, 2005 6:45 am
- Forum: Federal
- Topic: Is S. 397 a Trojan Horse?
- Replies: 13
- Views: 3750
I'm kinda going back and forth on this whole AP round thing...
If those types of rounds were not as demonized by the weenies in this country, we might not be having such a problem...I think these types of issues within the bigger scope of things makes it easier to get a leg up on infringements elsewhere...
Does that mean I want to possess and use AP ammo for everyday carry???
No...Do I want it now that it appears it is illegal to mearly possess this type of ammo???
Possibly...
Do I think I really need it??? No...
It just means I continue practicing hitting a pineapple sized target at 20 yards or less, on the move, and from behind cover...
If those types of rounds were not as demonized by the weenies in this country, we might not be having such a problem...I think these types of issues within the bigger scope of things makes it easier to get a leg up on infringements elsewhere...
Does that mean I want to possess and use AP ammo for everyday carry???
No...Do I want it now that it appears it is illegal to mearly possess this type of ammo???
Possibly...
Do I think I really need it??? No...
It just means I continue practicing hitting a pineapple sized target at 20 yards or less, on the move, and from behind cover...