For the Austin Data Center -- is there any effect from "critical infrastructure" rules (30.05 I believe)?
This entire building is known as the Austin Data Center and is dedicated to 'state functions' (not some portion), but I don't know who holds the lease/ownership and agree it would likely have to be adjudicated to be resolved -- or at least an AG letter of determination.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?”
- Fri Aug 24, 2012 10:10 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?
- Replies: 1085
- Views: 334200
- Thu Aug 23, 2012 10:01 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?
- Replies: 1085
- Views: 334200
Re: Cities improperly posting 30.06 signs?
Austin Data Center (ADC) for he State of Texas (government) Department of Information Resources (DIR) has a 30.06 sign on the front door.
9500 Metric Blvd., Suite 200, Austin, TX 78758
This is a piece of "critical infrastructure" but is it part of the definition of critical infrastructure?
It might have some technical ownership or leasing situation (Cap Gemini, Xerox etc) or some such but it is run for the State. Is it a government building?
Other considerations?
Given these answers (to above questions), is the 30.06 sign valid, is carry there legal or not?
9500 Metric Blvd., Suite 200, Austin, TX 78758
This is a piece of "critical infrastructure" but is it part of the definition of critical infrastructure?
It might have some technical ownership or leasing situation (Cap Gemini, Xerox etc) or some such but it is run for the State. Is it a government building?
Other considerations?
Given these answers (to above questions), is the 30.06 sign valid, is carry there legal or not?