TexasCHLforum.com

Think the sas sights are cool. I don’t know how well they really work for me but I do like it. I thought the same thing until we rented one at the range. In the store with good lighting, you could see the dot really well. In the indoor range, I couldn't see the dot at all. I ended up holding my pho...

... When the bill says "substantially similar", that leaves a lot open to interpretation. If they want to to preclude entry by signage, the bill should state "shall", not "may"... just like many states moved from "may" issue to "shall" issue on conc...

..."substantially similar" to the "big ugly sign" spelled out in PC 30.05... The law should say what it means, period... Do you not see how these two statements contradict each other? I agree, the law should say what it means, not "substantially similar" or "may&q...

..."substantially similar" to the "big ugly sign" spelled out in PC 30.05... The law should say what it means, period... Do you not see how these two statements contradict each other? I agree, the law should say what it means, not "substantially similar" or "may&q...

The "big ugly signs" allow property owners to retain their rights, and those same signs function to keep those carrying out of trouble (as long as the signs are heeded). So I guess this is where we disagree... I look at this very simply. Again, I know what the law states, this is just my ...

The "big ugly signs" allow property owners to retain their rights, and those same signs function to keep those carrying out of trouble (as long as the signs are heeded). So I guess this is where we disagree... I look at this very simply. Again, I know what the law states, this is just my ...

The inconsistency I see is the burden of property rights is OK for you if it's required (two big ugly signs) to keep out LTC, but there should be less burden to keep out the unlicensed. Why not a circle / sticker to (legally) keep out everyone carrying, licensed or otherwise. Because, as I already ...

I would like to ask, are you a business owner who plans on using "gunbuster" signs? Nope, just think that for unlicensed carry with no training requirements to cover all of the legalese, the best approach would be the simplest solution using something that everyone can understand. And I d...

I would like to ask, are you a business owner who plans on using "gunbuster" signs? Nope, just think that for unlicensed carry with no training requirements to cover all of the legalese, the best approach would be the simplest solution using something that everyone can understand. And I d...

I would like to ask, are you a business owner who plans on using "gunbuster" signs? Nope, just think that for unlicensed carry with no training requirements to cover all of the legalese, the best approach would be the simplest solution using something that everyone can understand. And I d...

Any comparison to no smoking signs, etc is not a valid comparison to gun signs. Those other signs have no force of law behind them. Verbal notice to leave would still have to be provided before trespassing could be applied. Proper gun signs carry the force of law, which is my mind is wrong. All thr...

I would like to ask, are you a business owner who plans on using "gunbuster" signs? Nope, just think that for unlicensed carry with no training requirements to cover all of the legalese, the best approach would be the simplest solution using something that everyone can understand. And I d...

You keep missing my point. A sticker with a circle / pictogram may very well convey the owner's intent. What it does not do is legally convey that the entry of non-license holders, without some other exception or Defense to 30.05, while carrying a firearm, is prohibited. Ok, finally we agree. My st...

Under Texas Law there is a prescribed means to Exclude a person that is carrying a handgun from a business, to Exclude a Person from open carrying a Handgun a business must post the prescribed 30.07 Sign it MUST be worded as the law states, if a business wants to Exclude a person carrying a handgun...

Under Texas Law there is a prescribed means to Exclude a person that is carrying a handgun from a business, to Exclude a Person from open carrying a Handgun a business must post the prescribed 30.07 Sign it MUST be worded as the law states, if a business wants to Exclude a person carrying a handgun...