If this is true, it is the business owner who is taking that risk.zimmerdesignz wrote:No but a 3006 and 3007 sign guarantees less risk involved, therefore more resean to "hit" that store as apposed to one without signs
If a customer thinks that it is an increased risk that they do not want to accept, they should not go into that store.
It is their choice whether or not to accept that perceived risk.
The customer does not make the decision whether to post signs, but they make the decision whether to walk past the signs.
The customer may not agree with the business owner's choice, but it is not their decision to make.