Search found 2 matches

by Jusme
Mon May 08, 2017 7:35 am
Forum: Self-Defense Reports
Topic: Dominos Driver Kills Robber
Replies: 25
Views: 6680

Re: Dominos Driver Kills Robber

oohrah wrote:According to the article, he was out of his vehicle, delivering the pizza, so he would have been unlawfully carrying when there was no threat.

If he gets off, it would send a message that anyone can carry w/o a license as a self-defense measure. and I believe they call that constitutional carry.

Exactly, and that should move our Lege, to push for it. This is a perfect example of why it can be a good thing.
by Jusme
Mon May 08, 2017 7:04 am
Forum: Self-Defense Reports
Topic: Dominos Driver Kills Robber
Replies: 25
Views: 6680

Re: Dominos Driver Kills Robber

Keith B wrote:Even if out of the vehicle, he may have an out:
Sec. 46.02. UNLAWFUL CARRYING WEAPONS. (a) A person commits an offense if the person intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly carries on or about his or her person a handgun, illegal knife, or club if the person is not:
(1) on the person's own premises or premises under the person's control; or
(2) inside of or directly en route to a motor vehicle or watercraft that is owned by the person or under the person's control.
(a-1) A person commits an offense if the person intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly carries on or about his or her person a handgun in a motor vehicle or watercraft that is owned by the person or under the person's control at any time in which:
(1) the handgun is in plain view, unless the person is licensed to carry a handgun under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code, and the handgun is carried in a shoulder or belt holster; or
(2) the person is:
(A) engaged in criminal activity, other than a Class C misdemeanor that is a violation of a law or ordinance regulating traffic or boating;
(B) prohibited by law from possessing a firearm; or
(C) a member of a criminal street gang, as defined by Section 71.01.
..........
(h) It is a defense to prosecution under Subsection (a), (a-1), (a-2), or (a-3) that the actor, at the time of the commission of the offense, displayed the handgun under circumstances in which the actor would have been justified in the use of force or deadly force under Chapter 9.

:iagree:

I doubt that a grand jury will rule against him, since he was defending his life. There have been too many instances, where a delivery person has been killed or injured, by just this type of scenario. I pray for the young man, because even taking a life in self defense is devastating.

Hopefully, future thugs will start to get the message, that they can't continue to commit these crimes without consequence.

Return to “Dominos Driver Kills Robber”