Search found 4 matches

by ScottDLS
Wed Oct 11, 2017 7:23 pm
Forum: Federal
Topic: Hearing Protection Act of 2017
Replies: 148
Views: 46436

Re: Hearing Protection Act of 2017

When my daughter was 6 years old she used to make a ridiculous statement, then follow it loudly with the statement "I'M SARCASTIC!". I just depend on people recognizing my rapier sharp wit and Beavis and Butthead avatar.
by ScottDLS
Thu Oct 05, 2017 3:01 pm
Forum: Federal
Topic: Hearing Protection Act of 2017
Replies: 148
Views: 46436

Re: Hearing Protection Act of 2017

What we really need is a Federal law banning and confiscating autoloader rifles that are not equipped with a rate of fire slowing device (ROFSD), that keeps you from pulling the trigger more than once every two seconds. All existing semi-rifles must be registered IAW NFA after having ROFSD installed. And if you are discovered pulling the trigger of your semi-auto more than once per 2 seconds you will be guilty, you lose your gun and are guilty of a felony. Most responsible ranges already prohibit rapid fire, so this is a simple, common sense, gun law that even the NRA should be able to get behind.

And why does anyone need drum magazines that hold 50 or 100 deadly bullets? These are unnecessary and illegal for deer hunting so they should be banned.
by ScottDLS
Tue Oct 03, 2017 5:38 pm
Forum: Federal
Topic: Hearing Protection Act of 2017
Replies: 148
Views: 46436

Re: Hearing Protection Act of 2017

Fake news. Was never scheduled for a vote this week anyway. At least according to this

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavl ... s-n2390255
by ScottDLS
Sat Jan 14, 2017 12:25 pm
Forum: Federal
Topic: Hearing Protection Act of 2017
Replies: 148
Views: 46436

Re: Hearing Protection Act of 2017

Can we work on 18 USC 922o also....? Nah...I didn't think so.... :evil2:

Return to “Hearing Protection Act of 2017”