What? No acknowledgment of the error?Mike1951 wrote:The post was accessable last night, so it has been removed. I asked my question to be sure of the facts prior to joining and responding.Charles L. Cotton wrote:Correct, SB766 doesn't repeal subsections (c) and (d).Mike1951 wrote:Am I correct in my reading that, since SB766 only specifies the changes to 229.001, that (c) and (d) are still present and unchanged?
It doesn't make sense that they would add (e) unless (c) and (d) were retained.
Everything in MR REDNECK'S post is false.
Chas.
Others must have gotten the point across first.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Another False Allegation by LSCDL President Re: SB766”
- Sun May 29, 2011 4:27 pm
- Forum: 2011 Texas Legislative Session
- Topic: Another False Allegation by LSCDL President Re: SB766
- Replies: 18
- Views: 12483
Re: Another False Allegation by LSCDL President Re: SB766
- Sun May 29, 2011 11:37 am
- Forum: 2011 Texas Legislative Session
- Topic: Another False Allegation by LSCDL President Re: SB766
- Replies: 18
- Views: 12483
Re: Another False Allegation by LSCDL President Re: SB766
All I know is that I joined OCDO a few days ago because I had a specific question about OC in Arizona. The question got answered. But in perusing another thread, I saw MR. REDENCK (he can't even spell "redneck" correctly) posting a personal attack against Charles Cotton, so I challenged him on the specific misinformation he was spouting. It didn't go over very well with him. So here we have a guy who can't spell his own handle correctly offering to interpret laws. Worse yet, he has a preconceived conclusion, and then tries to twist the legal interpretation to fit his conclusion. To do so, he has to A) deliberately ignore the wording of certain sections; and B) flat out lie about what the other sections say. I've never seen a person with less personal integrity hold such sway over a national forum before. Absolutely incredible. It causes me to doubt the validity of whatever is posted by the "experts" about open carry in states that already have it.
And then, after my question got answered by someone with the handle "azcdlfred," he asked me to support open carry in Texas by joining LSCDL. If MR. REDENCK is the president of LSCDL, then I have to doubt the reliability of the information that azcdlfred gave me about OC in Arizona. And I certainly can't take on faith anything said there about other RKBA related Texas legislation.
I am all for Open Carry/Constitutional Carry as the endgame for Texas, but I feel that irresponsibility and bomb-throwing in pursuing it will do more harm than good. And even though this forum is dedicated to Concealed Carry in Texas, I think that this forum is also the best and most responsible place to discuss the eventual implementation of OC in Texas. Charles himself has stated that he would get behind an OC bill if certain—very reasonable—criteria were met. And for the record, those criteria have nothing to do with restrictions on OC, but rather on protecting the gains already made for CC—something about which knuckleheads like MR. REDENCK seem to be almost deliberately obtuse.
In fact, he is so deliberately ignorant about what the law actually says and about how laws ought to be written, and he's such a caricature of the "radica gun nut" feared and demonized by the lamestream media, that if I didn't know better I would suspect that he is a troll and a plant, deliberately sowing misinformation to help cloud the arguments in favor of advancing the RKBA. I certainly wish the man no ill-will in terms of his personal health, but I note that Zechariah, the father of John the Baptist, was struck dumb because he refused to believe the prophesy foretelling his son's birth. He was unable to speak until the prophesy was fulfilled. I wish that for MR. REDENCK.
And then, after my question got answered by someone with the handle "azcdlfred," he asked me to support open carry in Texas by joining LSCDL. If MR. REDENCK is the president of LSCDL, then I have to doubt the reliability of the information that azcdlfred gave me about OC in Arizona. And I certainly can't take on faith anything said there about other RKBA related Texas legislation.
I am all for Open Carry/Constitutional Carry as the endgame for Texas, but I feel that irresponsibility and bomb-throwing in pursuing it will do more harm than good. And even though this forum is dedicated to Concealed Carry in Texas, I think that this forum is also the best and most responsible place to discuss the eventual implementation of OC in Texas. Charles himself has stated that he would get behind an OC bill if certain—very reasonable—criteria were met. And for the record, those criteria have nothing to do with restrictions on OC, but rather on protecting the gains already made for CC—something about which knuckleheads like MR. REDENCK seem to be almost deliberately obtuse.
In fact, he is so deliberately ignorant about what the law actually says and about how laws ought to be written, and he's such a caricature of the "radica gun nut" feared and demonized by the lamestream media, that if I didn't know better I would suspect that he is a troll and a plant, deliberately sowing misinformation to help cloud the arguments in favor of advancing the RKBA. I certainly wish the man no ill-will in terms of his personal health, but I note that Zechariah, the father of John the Baptist, was struck dumb because he refused to believe the prophesy foretelling his son's birth. He was unable to speak until the prophesy was fulfilled. I wish that for MR. REDENCK.