Search found 2 matches

by Charles L. Cotton
Wed Jan 23, 2013 8:55 pm
Forum: 2013 Texas Legislative Session
Topic: Lowering CHL fees
Replies: 44
Views: 7790

Re: Lowering CHL fees

Zoo wrote:Nobody denies the fees are artificially high. :lol: :shock: Freedom includes a free market. I now will encourage everyone who asks to get a license from another state until Texas has fees in line with Arizona, Utah, Ohio, etc.
Be sure to tell them they may be wasting their money if Lon Burnam's bill passes.

Chas.
by Charles L. Cotton
Wed Jan 23, 2013 7:50 pm
Forum: 2013 Texas Legislative Session
Topic: Lowering CHL fees
Replies: 44
Views: 7790

Re: Lowering CHL fees

Richard_B wrote:
Jumping Frog wrote:
JP171 wrote:If a reduced fee CHL is given to a teacher is has to be considered a benefit same as it is for those of us in the military and does get put on the 1099 form I get from the comptroller every year.

I do agree that the cost is excessive and could be lowered since all DPS does is administrative work with it and does not give the local police/sheriff any of the money for actually researching the background. so 140 divided by 5 is 28 per year, so how low would you like it? 40 for 5? no I am not being disagreeable just looking for a reasonable number as an idea. I pay about 120 a year in license fees just to work so another 28 isn't so bad per year
I paid $20 for my non-resident PA license. My Utah non-resident renewal will be $15. My original Utah and Ohio licenses were about $50.
DPS has continually had a policy of intentional inefficiency both for the purpose of empire building and to justify artificially high fees.
DPS doesn't get any money from CHL fees.

Chas.

Return to “Lowering CHL fees”