Search found 2 matches

by Mike1951
Sun May 29, 2011 3:37 pm
Forum: 2011 Texas Legislative Session
Topic: Another False Allegation by LSCDL President Re: SB766
Replies: 18
Views: 12582

Re: Another False Allegation by LSCDL President Re: SB766

Charles L. Cotton wrote:
Mike1951 wrote:Am I correct in my reading that, since SB766 only specifies the changes to 229.001, that (c) and (d) are still present and unchanged?

It doesn't make sense that they would add (e) unless (c) and (d) were retained.
Correct, SB766 doesn't repeal subsections (c) and (d).

Everything in MR REDNECK'S post is false.

Chas.
The post was accessable last night, so it has been removed. I asked my question to be sure of the facts prior to joining and responding.

Others must have gotten the point across first.
by Mike1951
Sun May 29, 2011 12:40 am
Forum: 2011 Texas Legislative Session
Topic: Another False Allegation by LSCDL President Re: SB766
Replies: 18
Views: 12582

Re: Another False Allegation by LSCDL President Re: SB766

Am I correct in my reading that, since SB766 only specifies the changes to 229.001, that (c) and (d) are still present and unchanged?

It doesn't make sense that they would add (e) unless (c) and (d) were retained.

Return to “Another False Allegation by LSCDL President Re: SB766”