Search found 1 match

by jmra
Sat Feb 14, 2015 10:02 am
Forum: Federal
Topic: Cornyn Introduces Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity
Replies: 71
Views: 16240

Re: Cornyn Introduces Constitutional Concealed Carry Recipro

SewTexas wrote:OK, he's touting this as a way use your TX CHL to drive from TX to, oh, WA (for lack of a better idea). Now, he's making it sound like you get to follow TX law all the way up, "because that's what you do when you drive" (before you ask, no I can't find the article from a few days ago)
......BUT YOU DON'T....
you DON'T get to do that when you drive. You have to follow local law when you drive. If you hit CA and you don't know if you are allowed to take a U turn with or without a sign, you are going to be in trouble and probably get a ticket.

that is my first problem with it.
secondly, I honestly don't think that once the door is cracked open to the Feds it won't be slammed open like my teenaged son slamming through it. Any time the Feds get involved with something rights get lost, taxes get raised, stuff gets more confusing.

Nope, this is not good.
1. I haven't seen anywhere that he is suggesting you wouldn't have to follow local laws. If that has been stated please provide a link
2. The door was removed from its hinges a long time ago.

Return to “Cornyn Introduces Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity”