Hmmm...The Annoyed Man wrote:I just want to clarify...... For me, it's not really a matter of disagreement. I WANT the opposite to be true, but I just think that many LEOs, once they are apprised of your CHL, are not going to be able to see past it to concede your right to carry in and out of the workplace under MPA instead of under the authority of CHL. The problem is that it is one of those areas of the law which is not clearly defined, and authority, being what it is, is not likely to interpret those things in favor of individual liberty.sjfcontrol wrote:Well, if it's not in Texas Law, then it's not in Texas CHL law either.The Annoyed Man wrote: And I still think that CHL trumps MPA for the CHL holder.
As for the highlighted part -- we'll just have to agree to disagree.
So, I now know what you think, and what you want, but what do you believe? "Legally", analyzing the laws as written, and given that there are no precedents to rely on, do you believe that CHL trumps MPA? IOW, If you can't beat the ride, will you still beat the wrap?