TexasCHLforum.com

It's much worse than that.....this "Constitutional Scholar" is attempting to subvert the fundamental principles of the Constitution. He's basically saying that a majority vote trumps the Constitution --and note even a majority vote, really, since given the percentage of voters, a majority is essentially just a plurality. Furthermore, he's not even talking about a vote of the people, but a vote of those bought-and-paid-for criminals in Congress masquerading as "representatives" of the "people." By his logic, a majority in Congress could then abrogate anything in the Constitution without any judicial review. Of course, this is the same Criminal-in-Chief whose Attorney General claims that having BO make a unilateral decision is the same "due process" as a trial by jury. It's pure demagoguery --he is by far the most irresponsible and dangerous president to ever hold office in this country.