It actually not even a criminal act for someone to authorize a 30.06 sign to be posted on government property. It would be a whole lot cooler if the law was written that way!Soccerdad1995 wrote:The sign may not have broken any laws, but if the sign is on government owned property, then it may be evidence of a criminal act by someone who illegally authorized the sign to be posted. Even in that case, the sign itself would not be guilty of a crime.steveincowtown wrote:Not to nit pick, but we all get that this sign is legal no matter what. It has broken no laws.
Now whether it is "enforceable" may be up for debate.
Has anyone ever been arrested and convicted for carry past any sign? Especially 30.06? I have never heard of a case or seen a news story?
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Is it legal? Sign split in two...”
- Wed Aug 02, 2017 11:18 am
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Is it legal? Sign split in two...
- Replies: 39
- Views: 10980
Re: Is it legal? Sign split in two...
- Mon Jul 31, 2017 7:38 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Is it legal? Sign split in two...
- Replies: 39
- Views: 10980
Re: Is it legal? Sign split in two...
Not to nit pick, but we all get that this sign is legal no matter what. It has broken no laws.
Now whether it is "enforceable" may be up for debate.
Has anyone ever been arrested and convicted for carry past any sign? Especially 30.06? I have never heard of a case or seen a news story?
Now whether it is "enforceable" may be up for debate.
Has anyone ever been arrested and convicted for carry past any sign? Especially 30.06? I have never heard of a case or seen a news story?