TexasCHLforum.com

tomtexan wrote:

steveincowtown wrote:

tomtexan wrote:

fickman wrote:Right or wrong, most LEOs aren't Constitutional lawyers. Most of them are trying their best to find bad guys and inadvertently end up wasting the GGs time every now and then. I used to get angry the few times I got pulled over in high school and the first question they asked was, "How much have you had to drink tonight?" (I didn't have a drink until I was 25.)

You should have returned with a question "How many donuts have you had to eat tonight?"

I know this is just a joke, but I find it a wee bit disrectful to LEOs on this board and in general.


There are a lot of good LEOs out there, a couple not as good, but I would hope we can show them the same respect we deserve!

steveincowtown, it was meant as a joke and judging by the replies following your comment, it appears it was taken that way. You might just be a wee bit too tightly wrapped.

tomtexan wrote:

fickman wrote:Right or wrong, most LEOs aren't Constitutional lawyers. Most of them are trying their best to find bad guys and inadvertently end up wasting the GGs time every now and then. I used to get angry the few times I got pulled over in high school and the first question they asked was, "How much have you had to drink tonight?" (I didn't have a drink until I was 25.)

You should have returned with a question "How many donuts have you had to eat tonight?"

WildBill wrote:

anygunanywhere wrote:

Jaguar wrote:Odd, no reason for the stop, just wanted to see your ID? I didn't think we were required to show ID to police unless we are suspected in a crime; were you speeding to attend to your dog's needs?

No reason from what I could tell. I had pulled in and stopped when he pulled in behind me. Not a nice neighborhood so mebbe he was hoping for a druggie. I think I disappointed him.

Anygunanywhere

Not many people wash their cars at 4:00AM.