Any progress on this bill which seeks to repeal one of the most unjust and meaningless weapons bans?
My guess is that the ACOE really isn't that anti-gun or eager to catch violators, but rather may just be too lazy to formally update the rules.
Search found 4 matches
Return to “ACOE land and federal HR 1865”
- Thu Mar 15, 2012 9:59 am
- Forum: Federal
- Topic: ACOE land and federal HR 1865
- Replies: 42
- Views: 10461
- Wed Sep 07, 2011 9:40 pm
- Forum: Federal
- Topic: ACOE land and federal HR 1865
- Replies: 42
- Views: 10461
Re: ACOE land and federal HR 1865
A spineless and worthless idiot for sure. All he does is quote the current policy like an ACOE low-level employee.DEB wrote:John Carter
Member of Congress
I believe old John needs to go, but he ran unopposed last election, if I am not mistaken. John Carter has become one of those Roman type legislatures, he has forgotten he is a Texan and especially a Republican. IMO, we need to not forget these types when election time rolls around. I especially like how they always say, they are strong proponents for the 2nd Amendment, except for...
- Wed Sep 07, 2011 9:36 pm
- Forum: Federal
- Topic: ACOE land and federal HR 1865
- Replies: 42
- Views: 10461
Re: ACOE land and federal HR 1865
Troops that were disarmed due to to Army policy slaughtered at Fort Hood.
Troops that were disarmed due to to Army policy slaughtered at Carson City IHOP.
Civilians unable to carry on ACOE lands due to Army policy facing greater risk from hostile feral hogs, coyotes, and pot growers.
Does anyone see a pattern here?
Troops that were disarmed due to to Army policy slaughtered at Carson City IHOP.
Civilians unable to carry on ACOE lands due to Army policy facing greater risk from hostile feral hogs, coyotes, and pot growers.
Does anyone see a pattern here?
- Sun May 29, 2011 10:37 am
- Forum: Federal
- Topic: ACOE land and federal HR 1865
- Replies: 42
- Views: 10461
Re: ACOE land and federal HR 1865
The ACOE ban is even more flawed than employee parking lot and campus carry bans IMHO, and it is time the loophole be closed.
Niether private property nor "secure" areas are involved here, and since the Federal Government is the adversary, the Second Ammedment should apply more than ever.
Niether private property nor "secure" areas are involved here, and since the Federal Government is the adversary, the Second Ammedment should apply more than ever.