TexasCHLforum.com

Texsquatch wrote:Yeah, but we know law is open to interpretation, that's what judges & lawers do. I know there's always grey area, so I guess I typically err on the side of caution.

There's no grey area when it specifically states the way you have to post the sign.

If they choose to arrest you, when they were at fault, why are they not subject to the same result if they didn't follow the law?

If the "gunbusters" sign isn't legally binding to a CHL, how is an improper 30.06 binding?

Keith B wrote: It's the 30.06 sign. You should have learned that in your CHL class.

I could have sworn there was required registration with the state in order to post one.

Though I may be deluded.

None the less, if they post the sign incorrectly, how can you consider it to be legally binding?

How would a private business posting a 30.06 sign be fraudulent? I can see that they may not get the sign correct by law, but the intent of the business would be to prevent you from carrying concealed. But in doing so, how would they be trying to commit fraud? Is there not an application process to...

People can sue for anything, but in this case I think you would be throwing your money to the wind (aka the lawyer). However, while I am a strong supporter of 2A, I am just as strong a supporter of property owner rights. I feel a privately owned business should have the right to restrict whatever a...

There are no legal ramifications for posting an improper 30.06 sign. There was a bill introduced last year that would have posed a penalty for them on government buildings, but not private. However it never made the floor. As for 51%, there is a penalty for that from TABC. The establishment must po...

Taurus.40 wrote:When in doubt check out Texas 30.06. It tell which places are correctly posted.

That's not the point of this thread. I want to know what penalties an establishment would face for posting illegal 30.06 or 51%, since we would be arrested for carrying in legally restricted areas.

If the 30.06 they posted, assuming that they went through the legal means to restrict their business from legal concealed carry, was posted incorrect? If there are legal ramifications for someone carrying concealed in a legally restricted area, are there not legal ramifications for improperly postin...

Is there any case law or articles regardings someone going to court for violating a 30.06 that may not be posted correctly? I did a quick search and didn't see anything good. I'm wondering how people have made out on this type of situation. I know the law is clear on the requirements for posting a ...

RPBrown wrote:Legal sign, no. Would I want to argue with a judge about the legalities, again no.

Again...

APynckel wrote:

jmra wrote:Are you sure you want to argue that before a judge?

I have no intention of violating it, I am merely asking if it's legal.

Confirmed that even the largest letters are not 1" tall.

I have a new 32" waist Crossbreed gun belt for sale. Only attempted to be worn once, and discovered it was too small for my waist / holster combo. It's black, their 1.25" "wide" version, and very thick and rigid. My current belt is their 36" version of the same belt, and I c...

I have a few: My Colt Series 70 stainless 1911; Every mag would have a fail to feed, sent it in many times, never rectified. STI Shadow: Wouldn't go into battery due to the parallel slide spring being of inadequate spring rate. Replaced with my Les Baer that has never had a single failure of any kin...

Why not get a trust (I know it might be going away soon) and bypass the need all together? Plus, you can transfer the devices fairly easily to next of kin in case of necessity.

It will always be negligence of the 4 rules of firearms safety.

Thereby, negligence.