Corbon .44 Special 200-gr. DPX Report...

Renown Browning Hi Power Expert - Stephen A. Camp. Unfortunately, Stephen passed away and he will be greatly missed.

Moderator: carlson1

Locked

Topic author
Stephen A. Camp

Corbon .44 Special 200-gr. DPX Report...

#1

Post by Stephen A. Camp »

Today I was surprised that the opportunity to go to the range materialized. I wanted to try Corbon's new 200-gr. DPX load in .44 Special. My primary shooter in this caliber is an S&W Model 24 with a 6 1/2" barrel, but I chose the medium-size Taurus Model 431 with its 3" barrel because it was more likely to be carried for protection than the N-frame Smith & Wesson, and DPX is envisioned as a defense load against human aggressors.

Image
This is the revolver used with the DPX ammunition. I believe that this model is discontinued, but it was the only other .44 Special I own and the one more likely to be carried concealed for protection.

I shot the DPX over the chronograph and 10 shots yielded an average velocity of 1013 ft/sec from the 3" barrel. The lowest velocity of the string was 987 ft/sec, which exceeds Corbon's listed velocity of 950 ft/sec.

Image
In this picture we see the listed stats for the .44 Special DPX ammunition. Every shot fired over the chronograph exceeded the nominal velocity shown.

Accuracy was more than satisfactory. I fired the revolver DA-only at 7 yards to see if the revolver was manageable. Felt recoil was not excessive at all and DA control did not suffer. At 15 and 25 yards, groups were shot slow-fire and single-action from a rest. Ammunition that will not group holds no appeal to me.
The DPX grouped very well.

Image
This was not shot "combat style" but in slow, deliberate double-action. I wanted to see if recoil would force me to readjust my grip and also check it for accuracy. It did not force any grip changes.

The DPX ammunition was fired in both water and super-saturated newsprint, which was soaked for 24 hours and drained 30 minutes before shooting.

Image
The bullet on the right was fired into water. The two on its left were shot into the soaked newsprint. Average penetration in the newsprint was 8 1/2" compared to the reported 14 1/2" in 10% ballistic gelatin.

Extraction was easy and initially I was able to literally shake fired cases from the cylinder without using the ejector rod until enough shooting dirtied the gun a bit.

Image
At the left is an expanded 200-gr. 44 Special DPX. They're loaded by Corbon in Winchester cases and are firmly seated. The bullet is cannulured to prevent unseating from recoil, something that could prevent the cylinder from turning. On all cartridges examined, the roll crimp was nicely done and uniform. Fired primers shows no signs of excessive pressure.

I found this ammunition to be consistent in its expansion characteristics. Ten shots were fired into the soaked newsprint and the average recovered dimensions were 0.718 x 0.722 x 0.655" tall. X-bullets, being homogeneous copper alloy through and through do not fragment nor lose but miniscule bullet weight at all when used within their expected velocity envelope. None of the expanded bullets lost enough weight to be measured.

Image
The X-bullet used in Corbon's ammunition is made completely of a copper alloy. There is neither lead core nor jacket. It is designed to expand via six stiff and sharp-edged "petals."

For those interested in a considerably more detailed report, just click on this link:

http://www.hipowersandhandguns.com/Corb ... Report.htm

I was and am extremely impressed with this ammunition in .44 Special. For factory ammunition for self-protection, this is my first choice.

For more information on this ammunition, go to http://www.corbon.com

Best.

Kalrog
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 1886
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Leander, TX
Contact:

#2

Post by Kalrog »

That DPX loading sure does seem to be living up to the marketing hype. Now if only it wasn't quite so expensive and hard to find...
User avatar

Photoman
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 557
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 8:21 pm

#3

Post by Photoman »

Excellent report Mr. Camp. I've been wanting to see some results on this load. Where did you find the 10% gelatin results?

Topic author
Stephen A. Camp

#4

Post by Stephen A. Camp »

Hello. As was mentioned in the more detailed report, Mr. Shovell of Corbon reported that figure.

Best.
User avatar

Photoman
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 557
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 8:21 pm

#5

Post by Photoman »

I do apologize for asking before reading the extended report. I concur on the cost factor. Even though this ammo is expensive, the performance is worth it in my estimation.

Thank you for taking time to produce this excellent report and my compliments on the fine photography.

Topic author
Stephen A. Camp

#6

Post by Stephen A. Camp »

Hello, sir. Thanks very much. Now and again, some pictures inexplicably get
sort of "ragged" looking when published to the web. I think it has something to do with the Front Page extensions, but the "why" of it is beyond me.

Best.

Kalrog
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 1886
Joined: Mon Mar 28, 2005 10:11 am
Location: Leander, TX
Contact:

#7

Post by Kalrog »

Stephen A. Camp wrote:I think it has something to do with the Front Page extensions, but the "why" of it is beyond me..
It is probably something with the jpeg compression used when compressing the picture down to a size that is reasonalbe for web publishing. Some photos work well, others don't with specific algorithms.

Topic author
Stephen A. Camp

#8

Post by Stephen A. Camp »

Hello. I'll bet you are right as the pictures that caused problems had been reduced in size quite a bit.

Best and thanks very much.
User avatar

Photoman
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 557
Joined: Tue Nov 22, 2005 8:21 pm

#9

Post by Photoman »

I agree. It has to do with resizing the images. Some programs are better than others at doing this.
Locked

Return to “Camp's Corner”