Mass murder - trigger finger vs controls of airplane
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 3
- Posts: 17986
- Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 12:30 pm
Mass murder - trigger finger vs controls of airplane
I wonder if these statistics have been analyzed?
Are you at greater risk from one or the other?
Are you at greater risk from one or the other?
Re: Mass murder - trigger finger vs controls of airplane
Considering there are 100,000 global commercial flights per DAY and the number of events like this can be counted on one hand -two if you count 9/11, firearms are not going to be on the winning end.philip964 wrote:I wonder if these statistics have been analyzed?
Are you at greater risk from one or the other?
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 2505
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 3:27 pm
Re: Mass murder - trigger finger vs controls of airplane
I'm of the opinion that if people are willing to die, you'll never be able to completely prevent them from killing others. Not without completely removing the concept of "freedom".
The government (ours, I don't know about Germany's) requires that pilots be mentally fit and will actively yank a pilot based on a very low bar indication of any mental health issue. And once you've got a documented mental health issue, it's very expensive and time consuming to get flying status back if it's even possible at all. IMHO, it encourages pilots NOT to seek treatment of any sort - let alone treatment for a mental health condition. That's not the case with firearm ownership at all where you basically self-certify and the government has no right to request your medical records.
I'm not sure when locking doors and went into that particular German airplane.. If it was a change made post-911, it's particularly ironic, as that "safety" change essentially enabled a suicidal co-pilot.
The government (ours, I don't know about Germany's) requires that pilots be mentally fit and will actively yank a pilot based on a very low bar indication of any mental health issue. And once you've got a documented mental health issue, it's very expensive and time consuming to get flying status back if it's even possible at all. IMHO, it encourages pilots NOT to seek treatment of any sort - let alone treatment for a mental health condition. That's not the case with firearm ownership at all where you basically self-certify and the government has no right to request your medical records.
I'm not sure when locking doors and went into that particular German airplane.. If it was a change made post-911, it's particularly ironic, as that "safety" change essentially enabled a suicidal co-pilot.
-
- Banned
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 336
- Joined: Wed Jun 19, 2013 6:57 am
- Location: Close to Waco....but not too close.
Re: Mass murder - trigger finger vs controls of airplane
It does add some food for thought in the debate about how licenses and background checks can prevent persons from committing crimes with firearms/aircraft......
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 26796
- Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
- Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
- Contact:
Re: Mass murder - trigger finger vs controls of airplane
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015/03 ... m-convert/cb1000rider wrote:I'm of the opinion that if people are willing to die, you'll never be able to completely prevent them from killing others. Not without completely removing the concept of "freedom".
The government (ours, I don't know about Germany's) requires that pilots be mentally fit and will actively yank a pilot based on a very low bar indication of any mental health issue. And once you've got a documented mental health issue, it's very expensive and time consuming to get flying status back if it's even possible at all. IMHO, it encourages pilots NOT to seek treatment of any sort - let alone treatment for a mental health condition. That's not the case with firearm ownership at all where you basically self-certify and the government has no right to request your medical records.
I'm not sure when locking doors and went into that particular German airplane.. If it was a change made post-911, it's particularly ironic, as that "safety" change essentially enabled a suicidal co-pilot.
Screen shot of copilot's facebook page (caution, a couple of posters used not-for-10-yr-old-daughter language:
http://3-ps.googleusercontent.com/hk/9d ... __j6U.webp
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”
― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"
#TINVOWOOT
― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"
#TINVOWOOT
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 5240
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 8:26 pm
- Location: Richardson, TX
Re: Mass murder - trigger finger vs controls of airplane
Are you sure about that? In numbers, flights are much, much higher. 3,000 on 9/11 alone.TVGuy wrote:Considering there are 100,000 global commercial flights per DAY and the number of events like this can be counted on one hand -two if you count 9/11, firearms are not going to be on the winning end.philip964 wrote:I wonder if these statistics have been analyzed?
Are you at greater risk from one or the other?
The Constitution preserves the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation where the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. James Madison
NRA Life Member Texas Firearms Coalition member
NRA Life Member Texas Firearms Coalition member
Re: Mass murder - trigger finger vs controls of airplane
There has not been a fatal crash of a U.S. MAJOR airline in 14 years. The last fatal accident of any U.S. airline was in 2009. I flew F/E and F/O on the B-727 for the first 11 years of my Delta career (3 crew members), 15 years as Captain on the MD-88 (2 crew members), and the last 3 years as Captain on the 767-400 flying domestic and International (2 crew on domestic and 3 international over 8 hours. ) Prior to 911, we were not required to have a F/A in the cockpit when a pilot left. After 911, it was required because the F/A was required to look out the door peephole to verify the returning pilot. The flying pilot could not get up and let the other pilot in without leaving the airplane unattended. Having the F/A up there was NEVER to protect against crazy pilots. This is the second crash of an A-320 in the last few months. Airbus has a lot riding on this newest accident not being the fault of the aircraft. Airbus is a European Consortium and THEY have alot on the line too. Let the accident investigation run its' course and maybe the truth will come out. Knee jerk reactions are not needed.
Texas LTC Instructor
NRA Basic Pistol Instructor
NRA Life Patron Member TSRA Member
USMC 1972-1979
NRA Basic Pistol Instructor
NRA Life Patron Member TSRA Member
USMC 1972-1979
Re: Mass murder - trigger finger vs controls of airplane
Yes, yes I'm quite sure. The math is VERY easy.baldeagle wrote:Are you sure about that? In numbers, flights are much, much higher. 3,000 on 9/11 alone.TVGuy wrote:Considering there are 100,000 global commercial flights per DAY and the number of events like this can be counted on one hand -two if you count 9/11, firearms are not going to be on the winning end.philip964 wrote:I wonder if these statistics have been analyzed?
Are you at greater risk from one or the other?
Even if you add in 9/11, the number of people killed by murderous pilots over the last 30-ish years is about 3575. There are over 36,500,000 commercial flights a year. Say that's an average of about 100 souls per flight. That's 36,000,000,000 passengers per annum. (I'm guessing on the average load factor, but even if it was half it would still work) Given, those are 2014 numbers and they go up every year, so that's the highest year on record. Even if you count all 3575 people that died (which includes 9/11) in such events in the last 30 years divided by the passengers in ONE year it's one murder per 1,020,979 passengers. The real number would be exponentially lower.
Re: Mass murder - trigger finger vs controls of airplane
What knee jerk reaction are you referring to? I'm not seeing any.howdy wrote:There has not been a fatal crash of a U.S. MAJOR airline in 14 years. The last fatal accident of any U.S. airline was in 2009. I flew F/E and F/O on the B-727 for the first 11 years of my Delta career (3 crew members), 15 years as Captain on the MD-88 (2 crew members), and the last 3 years as Captain on the 767-400 flying domestic and International (2 crew on domestic and 3 international over 8 hours. ) Prior to 911, we were not required to have a F/A in the cockpit when a pilot left. After 911, it was required because the F/A was required to look out the door peephole to verify the returning pilot. The flying pilot could not get up and let the other pilot in without leaving the airplane unattended. Having the F/A up there was NEVER to protect against crazy pilots. This is the second crash of an A-320 in the last few months. Airbus has a lot riding on this newest accident not being the fault of the aircraft. Airbus is a European Consortium and THEY have alot on the line too. Let the accident investigation run its' course and maybe the truth will come out. Knee jerk reactions are not needed.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 1434
- Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 7:16 pm
- Location: Paradise Texas
Re: Mass murder - trigger finger vs controls of airplane
Very interesting article and facebook screenshots. Nothing to see here folks just a peaceable fellow with mental issues.The Annoyed Man wrote:
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2015/03 ... m-convert/
Screen shot of copilot's facebook page (caution, a couple of posters used not-for-10-yr-old-daughter language:
http://3-ps.googleusercontent.com/hk/9d ... __j6U.webp
The White House says no link to terrorism so book those seats and fly away people...
III
Re: Mass murder - trigger finger vs controls of airplane
From what has been released already a lot of the truth appears to be out. From your expertise on this subject is there a solution? Should there be a secret air marshal on every flight (hopefully a non-suicidal one) with a capability to open the cockpit in an emergency? I don't see a flight attendant in the cockpit as much of a deterrent. Pure speculation but any response from an experienced pilot is welcomed.howdy wrote:There has not been a fatal crash of a U.S. MAJOR airline in 14 years. The last fatal accident of any U.S. airline was in 2009. I flew F/E and F/O on the B-727 for the first 11 years of my Delta career (3 crew members), 15 years as Captain on the MD-88 (2 crew members), and the last 3 years as Captain on the 767-400 flying domestic and International (2 crew on domestic and 3 international over 8 hours. ) Prior to 911, we were not required to have a F/A in the cockpit when a pilot left. After 911, it was required because the F/A was required to look out the door peephole to verify the returning pilot. The flying pilot could not get up and let the other pilot in without leaving the airplane unattended. Having the F/A up there was NEVER to protect against crazy pilots. This is the second crash of an A-320 in the last few months. Airbus has a lot riding on this newest accident not being the fault of the aircraft. Airbus is a European Consortium and THEY have alot on the line too. Let the accident investigation run its' course and maybe the truth will come out. Knee jerk reactions are not needed.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 2505
- Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 3:27 pm
Re: Mass murder - trigger finger vs controls of airplane
Adding an air marshal is just adding another potential single point of security failure. Having that work out just depends on the statistics for screening air marshals over pilots. There is no perfect system that will be totally secure. We should perhaps focus our energy (and tax dollars) not on what the media sensationalizes, but on what actually causes death and harm in the USA.. And statistically, airlines aren't at the top of the list.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 7863
- Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 9:16 am
- Location: Richmond, Texas
Re: Mass murder - trigger finger vs controls of airplane
If I am somewhere where a trigger press might end my life odds are I also have a trigger to press.
OTOH if I am where a crazy pilot or terrorist is soon to auger me into a solid object or dirt odds are I might have a spork to defend myself.
Easy choice for me. I might not ever fly again.
OTOH if I am where a crazy pilot or terrorist is soon to auger me into a solid object or dirt odds are I might have a spork to defend myself.
Easy choice for me. I might not ever fly again.
"When democracy turns to tyranny, the armed citizen still gets to vote." Mike Vanderboegh
"The Smallest Minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities." – Ayn Rand
"The Smallest Minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities." – Ayn Rand
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 10371
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 6:51 am
- Location: Ellis County
Re: Mass murder - trigger finger vs controls of airplane
anygunanywhere wrote:If I am somewhere where a trigger press might end my life odds are I also have a trigger to press.
OTOH if I am where a crazy pilot or terrorist is soon to auger me into a solid object or dirt odds are I might have a spork to defend myself.
Easy choice for me. I might not ever fly again.
I used to fly weekly. The last decade I can count on on one hand how many times I've flown.
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid.
John Wayne
NRA Lifetime member
John Wayne
NRA Lifetime member