DEEPER than IWB

Holsters, sights, magazines, etc.

Moderators: carlson1, longtooth, Keith B

Re: DEEPER than IWB

Postby psijac » Fri Dec 21, 2012 10:06 am

recaffeination wrote:I was impressed by the ccw breakaway pants but I don't have enough slack(s)in my budget.


Stealth pun ftw :anamatedbanana
07/25/09 - CHL class completed
07/31/09 - Received Pin/Packet sent.
09/23/09 - Plastic in hand!!
User avatar
psijac
Senior Member
 
Posts: 716
Joined: Fri Jul 31, 2009 2:08 am

Re: DEEPER than IWB

Postby anygunanywhere » Fri Dec 21, 2012 10:18 am

Keith B wrote:
Maxwell wrote:TAM,

"Heater"???? ROTFLOL! I think the last time I heard that term was an old Star Trek where Kirk and Spook traveled to the 1950's.

And yes I am showing my age as I probably saw the original broadcast of that show...

"rlol"


Think TAM has been reading his old archive of Mickey Spillane novels again. :lol:


Think Roscoe.

Anygunanywhere
The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants. - Thomas Jefferson
III%
http://oathkeepers.org/oath/
User avatar
anygunanywhere
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4089
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 9:16 am
Location: Clear Lake Shores, TX during the week, La Grange TX on the weekends.

Re: DEEPER than IWB

Postby Abraham » Fri Dec 21, 2012 10:49 am

and when I read someone posting "strapped", I just roll my eyes...
Abraham
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1886
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:43 am

Re: DEEPER than IWB

Postby Thomas » Fri Dec 21, 2012 4:13 pm

http://ccwbreakaways.com/

I have a pair of their Khakis. It's a bit expensive ($85), but worth it IMO.
"The greatest reward for serving others is the satisfaction found in your own heart."
User avatar
Thomas
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1161
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 12:36 pm

Re: DEEPER than IWB

Postby The Annoyed Man » Fri Dec 21, 2012 4:18 pm

Keith B wrote:
Maxwell wrote:TAM,

"Heater"???? ROTFLOL! I think the last time I heard that term was an old Star Trek where Kirk and Spook traveled to the 1950's.

And yes I am showing my age as I probably saw the original broadcast of that show...

"rlol"


Think TAM has been reading his old archive of Mickey Spillane novels again. :lol:

Hey, I was quoting the website I found the pants on. I would have called it a "gat" or "roscoe." :mrgreen:
"Freedom had been hunted round the globe; reason was considered as rebellion; and the slavery of fear had made men afraid to think. But such is the irresistible nature of truth, that all it asks, and all it wants, is the liberty of appearing." --Thomas Paine, Rights of Man, 1791
User avatar
The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
 
Posts: 14208
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: Grapevine, Texas

Re: DEEPER than IWB

Postby BigGuy » Fri Dec 21, 2012 4:47 pm

Maxwell wrote:TAM,

"Heater"???? ROTFLOL! I think the last time I heard that term was an old Star Trek where Kirk and Spook traveled to the 1950's.

And yes I am showing my age as I probably saw the original broadcast of that show...

"rlol"

Star Trek - A Piece of the Action
BigGuy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 291
Joined: Fri Aug 10, 2012 11:36 am

Re: DEEPER than IWB

Postby Jumping Frog » Sat Dec 22, 2012 9:22 am

There is always a tradeoff between degree of concealment and draw speed.

I don't see much point in carrying deeper than IWB. As it is, my draw from IWB is slower than a draw from OWB, but I can still draw "acceptably" quickly. If I need to draw, I don't want to be rooting around down in the front of my pants trying to find the handgun.

When I am carrying my 5" Govt 1911 IWB, that is acceptably concealed. I see no need to go smaller or more hidden.
-Bob . . . NRA Life member, TSRA Life member, TFC member, and OFCC Patron member

This froggie ain't boiling! Shall not be infringed! Μολών Λαβέ
More Obamination. Idiots.
User avatar
Jumping Frog
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3523
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 9:13 am
Location: Klein, TX (Houston NW suburb)

Re: DEEPER than IWB

Postby Right2Carry » Sat Dec 22, 2012 9:34 am

Reserve161 wrote:I have a couple of the 5.11 undershirts and they work, somewhat, for me.
I carried either a SW p99 or a full-sized 1911, but had problems with the gun
leaning to the opening and the velcro not able to keep it in.
Now, I was up and down installing lighting and taping extension cords to the
floor and stuff - not just sitting at a desk or walking around.

Perhaps with a smaller/lighter gun I wouldn't have that problem.

Haven't tried it with my new 3.5" (what is that, commander-sized? officer-sized?) 1911
because I got a Galco owb holster with it that works like a charm for me so far...


I had the same problem. I had to be really careful bending over because the weight of the gun would start working on the small pieces of velcro. I had my wife sew in additional length of velcro between the two small strips they provided on the shirt. It makes opening the shirt a little more difficult, but it seems to help keep my .45 Baby Eagle in place. This is not my preferred choice of carry but sometimes it is my only option. I still have found no substitute for IWB carry. I still do occasionally carry in a fanny pack or gun pack.
“Some people spend an entire lifetime wondering if they made a difference in the world. But, an American Soldier doesn't have that problem". — President Ronald Reagan, 1985
Right2Carry
Senior Member
 
Posts: 679
Joined: Fri Dec 01, 2006 2:29 pm
Location: Dallas/Fort Worth Area

Re: DEEPER than IWB

Postby troglodyte » Sat Dec 22, 2012 8:34 pm

I carry an XD9SC in a 5.11 everyday at work. I make sure the velcro makes good contact in the morning and don't have a problem the rest of the day.

I am very active at work on some days and may be upside down unloading crates.
User avatar
troglodyte
Senior Member
 
Posts: 516
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2004 4:16 pm
Location: Panhandle region

Re: DEEPER than IWB

Postby 1s1k52 » Mon Dec 24, 2012 10:28 pm

I am very limited with the uniform I am required to wear is the problem that creates the most constrictions. It is something I have tossed around for about a year but due to recent events disclosed to us about a fellow employee I have decided until I can find another job I need to think about being armed.
(insert clever signature here)
User avatar
1s1k52
Senior Member
 
Posts: 243
Joined: Fri Nov 19, 2010 12:40 am
Location: Mckinney (Texas obviously)

Re: DEEPER than IWB

Postby kde71450 » Fri Apr 05, 2013 11:15 pm

I am new to guns and conceal carry. (62 and somewhat bulging middle) My first carry weapon is a Ruger R40C. I specifically wanted something easy and didn't want to have to buy new clothes just for carry purposes. I was looking at some not so conventional systems.

http://tactipac.com/fusionpac-iwb-holster/fusionpac-video-information/

http://www.remoraholsterstore.com/ProductDetails.asp?ProductCode=Series-6ART

http://stickyholsters.com/products-page/product-category/md-4-sticky-holster/

And the one i just ordered Image

http://3speedholster.com/ I will offer review after receiving it and breaking it in. :txflag:
User avatar
kde71450
Junior Member
 
Posts: 31
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2013 11:58 pm
Location: Richmond/Rosenberg, TX

Re: DEEPER than IWB

Postby JALLEN » Fri Apr 05, 2013 11:31 pm

I have, and have used, a Safepacker http://www.thewilderness.com/index.php?p=product&id=2788&parent=145.

Image

Nobody ever gave it a notice, although it must be said that here CHL's are so few that you are more likely to encounter Bigfoot than a CHL holder.

It does require some discipline about not setting it down and leaving it somewhere.
User avatar
JALLEN
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1109
Joined: Mon May 30, 2011 4:11 pm
Location: Coronado, CA (not for long!)

Re: DEEPER than IWB

Postby jmra » Sat Apr 06, 2013 5:33 am

kde71450 wrote:I am new to guns and conceal carry. (62 and somewhat bulging middle) My first carry weapon is a Ruger R40C. I specifically wanted something easy and didn't want to have to buy new clothes just for carry purposes. I was looking at some not so conventional systems.

http://tactipac.com/fusionpac-iwb-holster/fusionpac-video-information/

http://www.remoraholsterstore.com/ProductDetails.asp?ProductCode=Series-6ART

http://stickyholsters.com/products-page/product-category/md-4-sticky-holster/

And the one i just ordered [ Image ]

http://3speedholster.com/ I will offer review after receiving it and breaking it in. :txflag:

No way ever am I sticking a loaded gun down the front of my pants.
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid.
John Wayne
NRA Lifetime member
User avatar
jmra
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3651
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 6:51 am
Location: Ellis County

Re: DEEPER than IWB

Postby hpcatx » Sun Apr 07, 2013 11:16 pm

jmra wrote:
kde71450 wrote:I am new to guns and conceal carry. (62 and somewhat bulging middle) My first carry weapon is a Ruger R40C. I specifically wanted something easy and didn't want to have to buy new clothes just for carry purposes. I was looking at some not so conventional systems.

http://tactipac.com/fusionpac-iwb-holster/fusionpac-video-information/

http://www.remoraholsterstore.com/ProductDetails.asp?ProductCode=Series-6ART

http://stickyholsters.com/products-page/product-category/md-4-sticky-holster/

And the one i just ordered [ Image ]

http://3speedholster.com/ I will offer review after receiving it and breaking it in. :txflag:

No way ever am I sticking a loaded gun down the front of my pants.

I have a Smart Carry, which I rarely use but is nice to have if dress requires deep concealment. It sits on top of other critical "equipment" down there, so the muzzle at least isn't pointing at you -- any more than IWB or OWB carry might have the muzzle directed at your leg at a given point in your gait.
"We have four boxes with which to defend our freedom: the soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, and the cartridge box." - L. McDonald
User avatar
hpcatx
Senior Member
 
Posts: 439
Joined: Tue Aug 23, 2011 11:21 am
Location: New Orleans, Louisiana

Re: DEEPER than IWB

Postby Skiprr » Mon Apr 08, 2013 12:28 am

hpcatx wrote:
jmra wrote:
kde71450 wrote:I am new to guns and conceal carry. (62 and somewhat bulging middle) My first carry weapon is a Ruger R40C. I specifically wanted something easy and didn't want to have to buy new clothes just for carry purposes. I was looking at some not so conventional systems.

http://tactipac.com/fusionpac-iwb-holster/fusionpac-video-information/

http://www.remoraholsterstore.com/ProductDetails.asp?ProductCode=Series-6ART

http://stickyholsters.com/products-page/product-category/md-4-sticky-holster/

And the one i just ordered [ Image ]

http://3speedholster.com/ I will offer review after receiving it and breaking it in. :txflag:

No way ever am I sticking a loaded gun down the front of my pants.

I have a Smart Carry, which I rarely use but is nice to have if dress requires deep concealment. It sits on top of other critical "equipment" down there, so the muzzle at least isn't pointing at you -- any more than IWB or OWB carry might have the muzzle directed at your leg at a given point in your gait.

I'll opt to disagree with that.

A SmartCarry pretty much points the muzzle of your carry gun at your opposite-leg femoral artery. Carrying on the hip at three-o'clock potentially endangers only one small artery, if that.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Thigh_arteries_schema_numbered.svg
It isn't just important any longer, it's critical. Join the NRA or upgrade your membership today!
NRA Patron Life Member
User avatar
Skiprr
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4400
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 4:50 pm
Location: Outskirts of Houston

PreviousNext

Return to Holsters & Accessories

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests