thankGod wrote:Sorry about the busted part. I was just looking at a PPS yesterday. I understand that they are nice shooters for the size and weight, and the slimness would make an easy CC.
Yes, I've been impressed with the gun until this relatively minor problem. Only wish they were more prevalent/popular so there'd be more replacement parts readily available (like Glocks) and night sights would be great - still not available AFAIK, but read a rumor that Walther unveiled an updated
PPS with night sights at the S.H.O.T. show.
It is a joy to carry IWB in a Crossbreed Supertuck. Easy to forget it's there.
Overall design/build is "tighter" than a Glock, thus accuracy is quite good for a 3-inch barrel, even with a slightly stiffer/grittier trigger than Glock. At 7 yards it is the equal to any of my Glocks. At 15 yards, I start to get a bit sloppy with it (likely because of the thinner grip). When compared to other firearms even close to its size, I am more accurate with my
PPS than almost anything I've shot close to it's size ... much more accurate than Kahr or J-frame revolvers, on par with Glock 27 and Bersa and Walther .380 "blowback" designs (but thinner than Glock and more powerful round than .380), not as accurate as an HK P7, but weighs less fully loaded than a P7 weighs empty. It definitely fills a nitch that needed to be filled, IMHO.
Anyway, here is the range report I posted back in September when I first picked it up.
http://www.texaschlforum.com/viewtopic. ... rt#p314349" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;