Rules of engagement

So that others may learn.

Moderators: carlson1, Keith B, Charles L. Cotton


Topic author
Rough_Ashlar
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 39
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 3:33 pm

Rules of engagement

#1

Post by Rough_Ashlar »

After hearing just a little bit ago about the gunman that shot a few people at a church (not sure where, I'm sure a link will be put on this thread soon)

I had this thought,

What is the requirement (if any) before you would engage (i.e. shoot) a hostile person who may have already discharged his weapon?

would you have to announce "I have a gun, drop your weapon"
would you just fire at him in order to stop the hostility?


My thinking is that if the aforementioned BG is firing his weapon, there shouldn't be any reason why you would have to announce your intent

which, in my view, would make YOU a target and possibly make a bad situation even worse

any thoughts?
CHL class 02 Mar 2008
mailed packet (with cashiers check) 03 Mar 2008
Recieved by DPS 10 Mar 2008
PIN mailed to me 25 Mar 2008
DPS Website- "Application Completed - license issued or certificate active"
Plastic in hand 20 Jun 2008
103 days
User avatar

WildBill
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 17350
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:53 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Rules of engagement

#2

Post by WildBill »

Good questions. IANAL, but there is no requirement to announce anything. IMO you do what you can do legally do to stop the threat of the BG. Your safety and the safety of innocents come before those of the BG. After all, he's the one who started the hostility.
NRA Endowment Member
User avatar

The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 26796
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: Rules of engagement

#3

Post by The Annoyed Man »

I'm not absolutely certain what the law would say, but I can tell you what my own moral inclinations would be...

In a situation like the one you postulate, if the other guy is already shooting, then you are already in the gunfight whether or not you want to be. In fact, I don't think you have any moral obligation to confront him before drawing your weapon and shooting him. I would go further and add that, if shooting him down from behind without any warning to him is what it takes to stop his assault, and you can do it without endangering any other people, then do it without reservation or hesitation. I am not a lawyer, but I think that your moral obligations derive from whether or not your actions, or lack of action, will further endanger other people or yourself. If shooting at him places others (besides the BG) at risk, then you must hold your fire. If not shooting at him allows others (besides the BG) to be injured or killed, then you must shoot.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
User avatar

tarkus
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 473
Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2008 7:59 pm
Contact:

Re: Rules of engagement

#4

Post by tarkus »

If he's shooting people I'm not going to waste time talking.
If you can read this, thank a teacher. If it's on the internet, thank a geek.

papabear
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 123
Joined: Tue Jan 30, 2007 8:14 pm
Location: Polk county

Re: Rules of engagement

#5

Post by papabear »

Me too. After shooting starts the only rule is get you & yours out alive.

austin
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 342
Joined: Sun Oct 15, 2006 12:02 pm

Re: Rules of engagement

#6

Post by austin »

There was a case in a mall in Washington state where a guy walked up behind a shooter and announced himself. He was shot and severly injured for his mistake. He had the drop on the shooter and just should have shot him.

If I am by myself, then I might manuver to engage the shooter if all I have is a pistol. I keep a scoped rifle in my truck and that is my go to weapon if I can get to it.

If I am with my family, then my duty is to get them as far away as possible.

It is not enough to avoid evil, evil must be confronted and defeated when possible.
User avatar

MrsFosforos
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 367
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 6:25 pm
Location: Dallas Area

Re: Rules of engagement

#7

Post by MrsFosforos »

I was wondering the same thing about the attempted carjacking last night at a mall in Dallas.

Specifically, I was wondering about when the woman had been armed, when would she know she needed to react? It sounds like she was trying to evade him when he shot her.
User avatar

gregthehand
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1398
Joined: Tue Oct 17, 2006 5:48 pm
Location: NW Houston, TX

Re: Rules of engagement

#8

Post by gregthehand »

If they are shooting or even about to shoot someone in my opinion they are bought and paid for. :smash:
My posts on this website are worth every cent you paid me for them.

yerasimos
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 472
Joined: Thu Mar 10, 2005 9:02 pm

Re: Rules of engagement

#9

Post by yerasimos »

I have received some training (from an otherwise well-regarded training organization) that advocates yelling at the assailant while shooting at him. However, I refused to incorporate that doctrine into my own. High-volume verbiage is unlikely to be understood amid the noise of gunfire and distracts from accurate shooting. Verbally challenging an assailant before shooting puts you in a reactive mode where you wait to see whether the assailant continues to attack or complies. This strengthens the assailant's position and weakens yours, both of which are undesirable. Furthermore, I believe the other circumstances surrounding the use of deadly force are more important than whether/how you verbally warned him before (or while :shock: ) you fired your weapon, or other artificial attempts to prepare witnesses.

As I see things, if a fight is on, it is time to win it, not to debate it.

bdickens
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 2807
Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 10:36 am
Location: Houston

Re: Rules of engagement

#10

Post by bdickens »

There's no such thing as a fair fight. If the shooting is justified, it is justified regardless of what warning you may or may not have given beforehand.

When the time comes for action, act and act swiftly and decicively. Don't talk about it, do it.
Byron Dickens

lrb111
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1551
Joined: Sat Feb 25, 2006 9:48 pm
Location: Odessa

Re: Rules of engagement

#11

Post by lrb111 »

go directly to work.
Stop,
Control,
Neutralize.....
Ø resist

Take away the second first, and the first is gone in a second.

NRA Life Member, TSRA, chl instructor

Double Naught Spy
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 38
Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2004 8:54 am
Location: Horn Hill Range in Texas

Re: Rules of engagement

#12

Post by Double Naught Spy »

Smile, Wait for the Flash.
"rlol"

Liko81
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 388
Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2007 2:37 pm

Re: Rules of engagement

#13

Post by Liko81 »

bdickens wrote:There's no such thing as a fair fight. If the shooting is justified, it is justified regardless of what warning you may or may not have given beforehand.

When the time comes for action, act and act swiftly and decicively. Don't talk about it, do it.
:iagree: :iagree: :iagree:

There are some times when you are justified drawing, and other more extreme situations where you are justified in firing. If you need to shoot, you do so without hesitation or you could end up dead. Usually if you do not need to shoot you should not draw.

tboesche
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 582
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 1:03 pm
Location: Fort Worth

Re: Rules of engagement

#14

Post by tboesche »

#1 Rule of Engagement"..............

WIN THE ENGAGEMENT!

:fire :fire :fire :fire
"Water's, wet, The sky is blue. And old Satan Claws, He's out there, and he's just getting stronger." Joe Halenbeck
"So what do we do about it?" Jimmie Dix
"Be prepared, Junior, That's my motto, Be Prepared". Joe Halenbeck

Laneman
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 57
Joined: Mon Oct 22, 2007 12:51 pm

Re: Rules of engagement

#15

Post by Laneman »

After reading the posts on this subject I think there is a need here for refresher training on the laws. I read them and reread them to keep them fresh in my mind because in an emergency I cannot afford to hesitate. To answer the question on this thread "What is the requirement (if any) before you would engage (i.e. shoot) a hostile person who may have already discharged his weapon?" Let's go straight to the written laws concerning a gunman that is shooting at people. Use of deadly force in defense of person (yourself) or in defense of another (the people that the gunman is shooting at). In this case a gunman is using what is called unlawful deadly force. The Texas law allows you to use deadly force against the gunman if you reasonbly believe you have to do so to protect yourself or others from the use or even attempted use of deadly force (shooting or attempting to shoot) directed at you or other people. Nothing in the law says you have to announce yourself. Like a camera, just point and shoot. Mind you, you need to make sure you're not shooting an off duty cop or another CHL legally defnding himself.
Please visit this link to read the laws and avoid hesitating should the need to protect yourself arise. http://www.txdps.state.tx.us/ftp/forms/ls-16.pdf
Post Reply

Return to “Never Again!!”