Purse snatch at Wal-Mart. What would you have done?

So that others may learn.

Moderators: carlson1, Keith B, Charles L. Cotton


gus
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 75
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 6:56 am
Location: Bastrop, Texas

Re: Purse snatch at Wal-Mart. What would you have done?

#91

Post by gus »

Good witness all the way unless the lady was being harmed in some way...

Gunner21
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 99
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2011 11:53 pm

Re: Purse snatch at Wal-Mart. What would you have done?

#92

Post by Gunner21 »

WildBill wrote:
Mr.ViperBoa wrote:What would you have done if you would have been able to do something about it? Just curious.
Call 911 and give a description of the persons and vehicles and watch from a safe place. Under the circumstances that you described, I wouldn't intervene.
I can't stress this enough. You are not Law Enforcement. Our CHL is there for personal protection. Call 911 file a witness report and move on.

Topic author
Mr.ViperBoa
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 293
Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 9:29 pm
Location: Bedford, Texas

Re: Purse snatch at Wal-Mart. What would you have done?

#93

Post by Mr.ViperBoa »

Gunner21 wrote:
WildBill wrote:
Mr.ViperBoa wrote:What would you have done if you would have been able to do something about it? Just curious.
Call 911 and give a description of the persons and vehicles and watch from a safe place. Under the circumstances that you described, I wouldn't intervene.
I can't stress this enough. You are not Law Enforcement. Our CHL is there for personal protection. Call 911 file a witness report and move on.
I will probably be unliked for saying this but o well. Stand by and do nothing while the bad guy gets away and then move on. That just doesn't set well with me. Just because it doesn't say "Law Enforcement" anywhere on my shirt. I guess we are supposed to just "move on". Well if there was more enforcing going on then we wouldn't have to worry about it. I think that is what is wrong with our world today. To many people doing nothing and waiting for some one else to do something. While innocent people are the ones who pay the price of either being killed, beaten, or just having what belongs to them taken away from them. If I had been 1 minute later walking to my car and been where I could have done something about it, I don't think I would have just "moved on" as you put it. I would have made sure he would have thought twice about doing it again. Like I said, its just what I would have done. Even if you beat the snot out of the guy for being a punk, you would probably go to jail for violating the scumbags rights when the "law enforcement" shows up. So either way you lose. Thats just my opinion and no disrespect to any police out there. I have spent enough time working police and most of my friends are police and they know how I feel as well. I hope this isn't taken the wrong way, but it probably will be. :tiphat:
Christian/Family man
Veteran
CHL Instructor
http://www.texaschlsolutions.com/
User avatar

Running Arrow Bill
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 239
Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 3:58 pm
Location: Wellington, TX
Contact:

Re: Purse snatch at Wal-Mart. What would you have done?

#94

Post by Running Arrow Bill »

A purse snatcher is not a justifiable reason for using deadly force and/or getting yourself hurt or shot...

There a lot of heros in ICU's and/or 6 feet in ground...

JMO

P.S.: If you want to be a hero, enroll in the Police Academy and get on the LEO force.
Running Arrow Farm, LLC
Wellington, TX. 79095
longhorncattle2013@gmail.ocom
Registered Texas Longhorn Cattle
User avatar

Oldgringo
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 13
Posts: 11203
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 10:15 pm
Location: Pineywoods of east Texas

Re: Purse snatch at Wal-Mart. What would you have done?

#95

Post by Oldgringo »

Mr.ViperBoa wrote:
Gunner21 wrote:
WildBill wrote:
Mr.ViperBoa wrote:What would you have done if you would have been able to do something about it? Just curious.
Call 911 and give a description of the persons and vehicles and watch from a safe place. Under the circumstances that you described, I wouldn't intervene.
I can't stress this enough. You are not Law Enforcement. Our CHL is there for personal protection. Call 911 file a witness report and move on.
I will probably be unliked for saying this but o well. Stand by and do nothing while the bad guy gets away and then move on. That just doesn't set well with me. Just because it doesn't say "Law Enforcement" anywhere on my shirt. I guess we are supposed to just "move on". Well if there was more enforcing going on then we wouldn't have to worry about it. I think that is what is wrong with our world today. To many people doing nothing and waiting for some one else to do something. While innocent people are the ones who pay the price of either being killed, beaten, or just having what belongs to them taken away from them. If I had been 1 minute later walking to my car and been where I could have done something about it, I don't think I would have just "moved on" as you put it. I would have made sure he would have thought twice about doing it again. Like I said, its just what I would have done. Even if you beat the snot out of the guy for being a punk, you would probably go to jail for violating the scumbags rights when the "law enforcement" shows up. So either way you lose. Thats just my opinion and no disrespect to any police out there. I have spent enough time working police and most of my friends are police and they know how I feel as well. I hope this isn't taken the wrong way, but it probably will be. :tiphat:
Who/where is the bad guy? The male in this scenario could very well be the husband/brother/father of the female who was demanding that his property, taken by the female, be returned. That property could turn out to be his "eargesplitten loudenboomer" which is now aimed at your face as in :fire . Now then, you are the bad guy and you may very well also be the dead guy who butted in on a domestic disagreement that did not require your aggressive and threatening interference.

Griz44
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 223
Joined: Mon Jun 09, 2008 6:39 pm
Location: Round Rock, TX
Contact:

Re: Purse snatch at Wal-Mart. What would you have done?

#96

Post by Griz44 »

A purse snatcher is not a justifiable reason for using deadly force and/or getting yourself hurt or shot...
Purse snatching off the person carrying it is robbery. Robbery is a felony. If it is forcefully taken, it may also be aggravated robbery. Robbery either way qualifies as a deadly force situation.

gemini
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 1103
Joined: Tue Dec 16, 2008 3:01 pm

Re: Purse snatch at Wal-Mart. What would you have done?

#97

Post by gemini »

Mr.ViperBoa wrote:
Gunner21 wrote:
WildBill wrote:
Mr.ViperBoa wrote:What would you have done if you would have been able to do something about it? Just curious.
Call 911 and give a description of the persons and vehicles and watch from a safe place. Under the circumstances that you described, I wouldn't intervene.
I can't stress this enough. You are not Law Enforcement. Our CHL is there for personal protection. Call 911 file a witness report and move on.
I will probably be unliked for saying this but o well. Stand by and do nothing while the bad guy gets away and then move on. That just doesn't set well with me. Just because it doesn't say "Law Enforcement" anywhere on my shirt. I guess we are supposed to just "move on". Well if there was more enforcing going on then we wouldn't have to worry about it. I think that is what is wrong with our world today. To many people doing nothing and waiting for some one else to do something. While innocent people are the ones who pay the price of either being killed, beaten, or just having what belongs to them taken away from them. If I had been 1 minute later walking to my car and been where I could have done something about it, I don't think I would have just "moved on" as you put it. I would have made sure he would have thought twice about doing it again. Like I said, its just what I would have done. Even if you beat the snot out of the guy for being a punk, you would probably go to jail for violating the scumbags rights when the "law enforcement" shows up. So either way you lose. Thats just my opinion and no disrespect to any police out there. I have spent enough time working police and most of my friends are police and they know how I feel as well. I hope this isn't taken the wrong way, but it probably will be. :tiphat:
Join the club. Some are wired to react, some are not. I personally hope that if my wife, daughter or sister needed help, someone like you
might be there to assist them.

johnson0317
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 1047
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2011 11:25 pm

Re: Purse snatch at Wal-Mart. What would you have done?

#98

Post by johnson0317 »

Griz44 wrote:
A purse snatcher is not a justifiable reason for using deadly force and/or getting yourself hurt or shot...
Purse snatching off the person carrying it is robbery. Robbery is a felony. If it is forcefully taken, it may also be aggravated robbery. Robbery either way qualifies as a deadly force situation.
Yeah, I see your point. However, if the robbery is basically over, and no one is in danger of losing their life, do you really want to go ahead and change that balance by blowing the BG out of his shoes, just because you can?

I don't think the worst part of it would be pulling the trigger. I think the worst part would be the doubt, the anguish, the regret, the dreams that replay it time after time. Knowing that someones husband/father/son won't be home tonight because I had the authority of force, even though it may not have been needed.

Obviously every scenario will play out differently. If we are not willing to pull our weapon, and use it, when the proper time comes, we need to just leave it at home. I pray that each one of us has done the soul-searching that needs to be done ahead of time. Work through your "unlock" or "condition" codes as the process unwraps so that you can make the right decision in the split 1/100 of a second. It will be bad no matter what, but worse if we can not be sure we did the right thing.

Most of all, I pray we never have to go to the gravest extreme.

RJ
CHL Received 5/16/11
Proud Member NRA
Proud Member Texas Concealed Handgun Association
Proud Member Second Amendment Foundation
Proud Member of The Truth Squad founded by Tom Gresham. "A lie left unchallenged becomes the truth"

Shoot Straight
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 152
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2010 2:28 pm

Re: Purse snatch at Wal-Mart. What would you have done?

#99

Post by Shoot Straight »

johnson0317 wrote:
Griz44 wrote:Purse snatching off the person carrying it is robbery. Robbery is a felony. If it is forcefully taken, it may also be aggravated robbery. Robbery either way qualifies as a deadly force situation.
Yeah, I see your point. However, if the robbery is basically over, and no one is in danger of losing their life, do you really want to go ahead and change that balance by blowing the BG out of his shoes, just because you can?
Also, in this case, as reported by the OP, it sounds like the purse was taken from the shopping cart while the woman was loading groceries into her car and not watching the purse.

I understand sometimes people feel a moral obligation to act, even if that action is not required by law, and may even be prohibited by law. In the latter case, it's especially important to know what the law says.
Ride
Shoot Straight
Speak the Truth

Aggiedad
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 48
Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 12:41 am

Re: Purse snatch at Wal-Mart. What would you have done?

#100

Post by Aggiedad »

I just read all 6-7 pages of this thread ... I come down somewhere in the middle between "just be a good witness" and "going after the purse snatcher. I might be tempted to follow the purse snatcher while dialing 911 but to actually confront the guy? No way. If things went south and I had to defend myself with deadly force, an aggressive DA could easily say I went looking for trouble ... Not worth potentially losing everything I have over a purse snatching that was not an aggrevated assault. Would I want someone to come to the aid of MY wife or daughter? YOU BET! But would I want them to risk his/her life over a few bucks, credit card, and ID? I don't think so.
User avatar

goose
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 881
Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2011 11:20 pm
Location: Katy-ish

Re: Purse snatch at Wal-Mart. What would you have done?

#101

Post by goose »

Aggiedad wrote:Not worth potentially losing everything I have over a purse snatching that was not an aggrevated assault. Would I want someone to come to the aid of MY wife or daughter? YOU BET! But would I want them to risk his/her life over a few bucks, credit card, and ID? I don't think so.
I land very close to this. To me there is a vast middle ground where I can intervene to make sure that the daughter/sister/wife is safe without pursuing, chasing or otherwise interacting with the bad guy. If my wife/sister/daughter were ever in this situation at Wal-Mart that is all I would ever ask of any of you. Letting the bad guy get away in no way implies that the only other option is to "stand by and do nothing."
NRA Endowment - NRA RSO - Μολὼν λάβε
User avatar

WildBill
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 12
Posts: 17350
Joined: Tue Jul 03, 2007 12:53 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Purse snatch at Wal-Mart. What would you have done?

#102

Post by WildBill »

goose wrote:Letting the bad guy get away in no way implies that the only other option is to "stand by and do nothing."
Well said Goose. :iagree:
NRA Endowment Member
User avatar

drjoker
Banned
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 1315
Joined: Sun Oct 18, 2009 12:19 am

Re: Purse snatch at Wal-Mart. What would you have done?

#103

Post by drjoker »

HotLeadSolutions wrote:
austinrealtor wrote:Yall are focusing on details of theft vs. robbery and missing the more important point that the crime had ALREADY happened. There was no longer imminent danger to OP or the purse snatch victim and using deadly force to recover property on behalf of third person in this case is a very slippery slope.

Think of the situation like this: would you intervene if you were NOT carrying? Because unless the criminal commits additional crimes (I.e. you block the purse thief's exit and he escalates, pulling a knife on you) then you're most likely not justified to draw your weapon on him in this case.
Like AR said, you are focusing on the wrong issue. I did not say I would immediately draw down on the guy. I said I would pursue and try to help. As far as having the "Right to Pursue" you do not have to be a LEO to pursue and help, the law says:


Texas Code of Criminal Procedure
Art. 14.01. [212] [259] [247] OFFENSE WITHIN VIEW.
(a) A peace officer or any other person, may, without a warrant,
arrest an offender when the offense is committed in his presence
or within his view, if the offense is one classed as a felony or as an offense against the public peace.

That law seems pretty broad. I would say that purse snatching would fall under that category (offense against the public peace) or even a felony if the purse was one of the $600.00 to $1000.00 varieties. Not real sure I would even want to make a citizens arrest, I would be happy to just beat the snot out of the guy, roll the dice and see what happens legally. What is he going to say? "Hi, 911?? I stole a ladies purse, and this guy chased me down...beat my butt and now I need the police..." I don't see that call going well.

We all have to make our own decisions. I am aware of the consequences I may face. Today he is snatching purses, tomorrow he will be holding up people at gun point in some parking lot somewhere. I would rather stop it now before the next victim is my wife. I just can't sit by and watch things like that happen. It is not in my wiring. The only thing that has to happen for evil to prosper, is for good people to do nothing.
Living in condition yellow means that you always know where the anonymous exits are. Make it a habit to scan for cameras (ATMs, traffic, etc). Just because you carry a gun doesn't mean you have to use it to solve every problem that comes your way. That's a little melodramatic, don't you think? You can help others, but just be anonymous and discreet about it. One time, I saw an elderly woman walk out of Wal-Mart and two young guys with hoodies trailed behind her. I yelled, "Hey, lady, you need some help with your bags?" The two young guys turned around and left. In case you have to use force, as long as you've done nothing wrong and just want to avoid a frivolous lawsuit, you can leave discreetly.
User avatar

kjolly
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 515
Joined: Tue Dec 21, 2010 10:00 am

Re: Purse snatch at Wal-Mart. What would you have done?

#104

Post by kjolly »

Is her purse worth your life and freedom or the death of the perpertator? Get description, and license number if they go to a car. Call 911. The laws under which you carry a weapon have very strict limitations. You are not a LEO. Even if the police caught this person he would quickly be back on the street. Risking your or anyone elses life in this scene are not worth it.
Texas CHL Instructor, NRA Certified Trainer, IDPA
NRA Range Safety Officer

http://www.tacticalpistol.us
User avatar

Purplehood
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 3
Posts: 4638
Joined: Thu May 29, 2008 3:35 pm
Location: Houston, TX

Re: Purse snatch at Wal-Mart. What would you have done?

#105

Post by Purplehood »

johnson0317 wrote: If we are not willing to pull our weapon, and use it, when the proper time comes, we need to just leave it at home.
I do not believe in the logical fallacy of the "if/then" argument. Nothing is ever cut and dry.
Life NRA
USMC 76-93
USAR 99-07 (Retired)
OEF 06-07
Post Reply

Return to “Never Again!!”