308 vs 7.62
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 5
- Posts: 1758
- Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 12:05 am
- Location: Free Republic of Texas
308 vs 7.62
Interesting image I found showing differences between .308Win and 7.62x51 (aka 7.62 NATO):
http://tinypic.com/r/1qfrr9/8" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://tinypic.com/r/1qfrr9/8" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
NRA Member
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio Operator
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 215
- Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2012 1:42 pm
- Location: Duncanville, TX
Re: 308 vs 7.62
Thanks for this useful info. A .308 or 7.62x51 chambered rifle is on the top of my "next gun" list. I thought the compatibility with the NATO round versus the "civilian" round would be the same as with the .223/5.56x45 rounds. Turns out it's the opposite. Very good to know!
Honor Necessity
Re: 308 vs 7.62
I think many AR style 7.62 rifles will handle both.
I have a Ruger SR-762 and it lists both rounds.
Caliber: 308 Win / 7.62 NATO
It's always best to check what is stamped on the barrel.
I have a Ruger SR-762 and it lists both rounds.
Caliber: 308 Win / 7.62 NATO
It's always best to check what is stamped on the barrel.
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 5
- Posts: 1758
- Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 12:05 am
- Location: Free Republic of Texas
Re: 308 vs 7.62
In a previous life when I owned an L1A1 (FN FAL) I used 308 and 7.62 brass interchangeably, but I also never loaded at or near maximum loads.
YMMV with different semi-auto rifles.
YMMV with different semi-auto rifles.
NRA Member
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio Operator
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 1001
- Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 10:30 am
- Location: Hickory Creek
Re: 308 vs 7.62
My Armalite AR-10 is stamped 7.62 NATO on the receiver and the owners manual show it will fire both .308 and 7.62x51mm
NRA Life Member
Re: 308 vs 7.62
Good grief OTTOMH I thought it was exactly the other way around--that a .308 firearm would not necessarily like "higher pressures of the 7.62x51".
Must be getting old.
Must be getting old.
Re: 308 vs 7.62
The M1 was the same way. Hunting rifled would shoot all military ammo plus hunting loads, but there were cautions against using machine gun and some hunting loads in the M1 because of pressure.TomsTXCHL wrote:Good grief OTTOMH I thought it was exactly the other way around--that a .308 firearm would not necessarily like "higher pressures of the 7.62x51".
Must be getting old.
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 5
- Posts: 1758
- Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 12:05 am
- Location: Free Republic of Texas
Re: 308 vs 7.62
Interestingly, my new FAL is stamped:
7.62 (.308 win)
I ordered some 7.62mm once-fired brass for reloading plus tools to remove the primer crimp. At the moment I plan to keep my 308 (bolt-action) and 7.62 NATO (FAL) brass and reloads separate.
I neck-size for the bolt action, which won't likely work for the semi-auto (luckily I already have a full-length resizing die).
7.62 (.308 win)
I ordered some 7.62mm once-fired brass for reloading plus tools to remove the primer crimp. At the moment I plan to keep my 308 (bolt-action) and 7.62 NATO (FAL) brass and reloads separate.
I neck-size for the bolt action, which won't likely work for the semi-auto (luckily I already have a full-length resizing die).
NRA Member
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio Operator
Re: 308 vs 7.62
Here is some basic ballistics for 308. http://www.ballistics101.com/308_winchester.php" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The base military/NATO round was 147g to 150g FMJ, FMJBT.
The base military/NATO round was 147g to 150g FMJ, FMJBT.
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 5
- Posts: 1758
- Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 12:05 am
- Location: Free Republic of Texas
Re: 308 vs 7.62
some more related links:
http://www.thegunzone.com/30cal.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.fulton-armory.com/%5Cfaqs%5C ... %5C308.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://how-i-did-it.org/762vs308/chamber.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.ballisticallyspeaking.com/th ... s-223.225/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
edited to add:
http://www.303british.com/id36.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.thegunzone.com/30cal.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.fulton-armory.com/%5Cfaqs%5C ... %5C308.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://how-i-did-it.org/762vs308/chamber.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.ballisticallyspeaking.com/th ... s-223.225/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
edited to add:
http://www.303british.com/id36.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
NRA Member
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio Operator
-
Topic author - Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 5
- Posts: 1758
- Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 12:05 am
- Location: Free Republic of Texas
Re: 308 vs 7.62
some disagreement here about what's in the image:
http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2015 ... s-7-62x51/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2015 ... s-7-62x51/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
NRA Member
Amateur Radio Operator
Amateur Radio Operator
-
- Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 135
- Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 11:05 am
- Location: Central Texas Area
Re: 308 vs 7.62
This has been my understanding........longer leade in the chamber. But, pressure remains higher in 308 due to shorter chamber leade. 223 vs 5.56, 6.8 vs 6.8 SPC II ,etc.ghostrider wrote:some disagreement here about what's in the image:
http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2015 ... s-7-62x51/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
My 308 Auto shoots both fine.