308 vs 7.62

For those who like to roll their own.

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

Post Reply

Topic author
ghostrider
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 1758
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 12:05 am
Location: Free Republic of Texas

308 vs 7.62

#1

Post by ghostrider »

Interesting image I found showing differences between .308Win and 7.62x51 (aka 7.62 NATO):


http://tinypic.com/r/1qfrr9/8" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
NRA Member
Amateur Radio Operator
User avatar

Kadelic
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 215
Joined: Fri Feb 17, 2012 1:42 pm
Location: Duncanville, TX

Re: 308 vs 7.62

#2

Post by Kadelic »

Thanks for this useful info. A .308 or 7.62x51 chambered rifle is on the top of my "next gun" list. I thought the compatibility with the NATO round versus the "civilian" round would be the same as with the .223/5.56x45 rounds. Turns out it's the opposite. Very good to know!
Honor Necessity

android
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 508
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 11:11 pm

Re: 308 vs 7.62

#3

Post by android »

I think many AR style 7.62 rifles will handle both.

I have a Ruger SR-762 and it lists both rounds.

Caliber: 308 Win / 7.62 NATO

It's always best to check what is stamped on the barrel.

Topic author
ghostrider
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 1758
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 12:05 am
Location: Free Republic of Texas

Re: 308 vs 7.62

#4

Post by ghostrider »

In a previous life when I owned an L1A1 (FN FAL) I used 308 and 7.62 brass interchangeably, but I also never loaded at or near maximum loads.

YMMV with different semi-auto rifles.
NRA Member
Amateur Radio Operator
User avatar

GeekwithaGun
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1001
Joined: Tue Apr 21, 2009 10:30 am
Location: Hickory Creek

Re: 308 vs 7.62

#5

Post by GeekwithaGun »

My Armalite AR-10 is stamped 7.62 NATO on the receiver and the owners manual show it will fire both .308 and 7.62x51mm
NRA Life Member

TomsTXCHL
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 469
Joined: Tue Dec 03, 2013 10:52 am

Re: 308 vs 7.62

#6

Post by TomsTXCHL »

Good grief OTTOMH I thought it was exactly the other way around--that a .308 firearm would not necessarily like "higher pressures of the 7.62x51".

Must be getting old.

:oops:

MeMelYup
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 1874
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2010 3:21 pm

Re: 308 vs 7.62

#7

Post by MeMelYup »

TomsTXCHL wrote:Good grief OTTOMH I thought it was exactly the other way around--that a .308 firearm would not necessarily like "higher pressures of the 7.62x51".

Must be getting old.

:oops:
The M1 was the same way. Hunting rifled would shoot all military ammo plus hunting loads, but there were cautions against using machine gun and some hunting loads in the M1 because of pressure.

Topic author
ghostrider
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 1758
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 12:05 am
Location: Free Republic of Texas

Re: 308 vs 7.62

#8

Post by ghostrider »

Interestingly, my new FAL is stamped:

7.62 (.308 win)

I ordered some 7.62mm once-fired brass for reloading plus tools to remove the primer crimp. At the moment I plan to keep my 308 (bolt-action) and 7.62 NATO (FAL) brass and reloads separate.

I neck-size for the bolt action, which won't likely work for the semi-auto (luckily I already have a full-length resizing die).
NRA Member
Amateur Radio Operator

MeMelYup
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 1874
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2010 3:21 pm

Re: 308 vs 7.62

#9

Post by MeMelYup »

Here is some basic ballistics for 308. http://www.ballistics101.com/308_winchester.php" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The base military/NATO round was 147g to 150g FMJ, FMJBT.

Topic author
ghostrider
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 1758
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 12:05 am
Location: Free Republic of Texas

Re: 308 vs 7.62

#10

Post by ghostrider »

some more related links:

http://www.thegunzone.com/30cal.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.fulton-armory.com/%5Cfaqs%5C ... %5C308.htm" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://how-i-did-it.org/762vs308/chamber.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
http://www.ballisticallyspeaking.com/th ... s-223.225/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

edited to add:

http://www.303british.com/id36.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
NRA Member
Amateur Radio Operator

Topic author
ghostrider
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 1758
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2007 12:05 am
Location: Free Republic of Texas

Re: 308 vs 7.62

#11

Post by ghostrider »

some disagreement here about what's in the image:

http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2015 ... s-7-62x51/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
NRA Member
Amateur Radio Operator

Rvrrat14
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 135
Joined: Tue May 18, 2010 11:05 am
Location: Central Texas Area

Re: 308 vs 7.62

#12

Post by Rvrrat14 »

ghostrider wrote:some disagreement here about what's in the image:

http://www.thefirearmblog.com/blog/2015 ... s-7-62x51/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
This has been my understanding........longer leade in the chamber. But, pressure remains higher in 308 due to shorter chamber leade. 223 vs 5.56, 6.8 vs 6.8 SPC II ,etc.

My 308 Auto shoots both fine.
Post Reply

Return to “Reloading Forum”