Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

Jumping Frog wrote:Personally, I think it is a lot more work for a benefit that has zero to do with ammunition quality.
First, it is smaller capacity unless you are talking the $700 size. Then you need to deal with sifting the SS pins from both the soapy water and the brass. Then you need to rinse the brass and dry it.
Not worth it to me. I throw mine in the vibratory tumbler with walnut shells, a cut-up used dryer sheet, a half cup of paint thinner, and a capful of NuFinish. Takes about two minutes. Then I run it on a timer. Later, it will take me another minute to pour it into my media separator and I am done.
Once my ammo is loaded, no-one can tell it apart from ammo wet-tumbled with SS.
Moby wrote:Thanks fella's
I did not know one could add paint thinner.
Does that make the walnut media unusable again?

Moby wrote:http://www.dillonprecision.com/#/content/p/9/catid/8/pid/23659/?viewImg=0
This looks like a good tumble in my price range.
Appreaiate ya,
APynckel wrote:I can run 100+ rounds of .45 acp through the thumbler for 4 hours and it comes out brand spankin new.
APynckel wrote:I switched from vibratory to stainless and I'll never look back.
I can run 100+ rounds of .45 acp through the thumbler for 4 hours and it comes out brand spankin new. The problem is, as I've found, IT'S TOO CLEAN for a progressive press. The carbon residue left over from firing actually acts as a lubricant in the dies. My SS wet tumbled brass will get "stuck" on the case flaring die in my Dillon Square Deal B.
However, for rifle ammunition, where cleanliness sorta matters, and you're going to be lubing it anyways, I prefer to wet tumble, then polish afterwards with a vibratory.
I have also tried ultrasonic, and it leaves much to be asked for compared to SS tumbling, and also vibratory. VERY low qty of brass to clean at a time, and I haven't seen any real benefits over a good SS wet setup.
Don2 wrote:APynckel wrote:I switched from vibratory to stainless and I'll never look back.
I can run 100+ rounds of .45 acp through the thumbler for 4 hours and it comes out brand spankin new. The problem is, as I've found, IT'S TOO CLEAN for a progressive press. The carbon residue left over from firing actually acts as a lubricant in the dies. My SS wet tumbled brass will get "stuck" on the case flaring die in my Dillon Square Deal B.
However, for rifle ammunition, where cleanliness sorta matters, and you're going to be lubing it anyways, I prefer to wet tumble, then polish afterwards with a vibratory.
I have also tried ultrasonic, and it leaves much to be asked for compared to SS tumbling, and also vibratory. VERY low qty of brass to clean at a time, and I haven't seen any real benefits over a good SS wet setup.
I have a question, is the 100 rounds a number you picked, or is that how many that tumbler will let you polish at one time?
Don2
APynckel wrote:Don2 wrote:APynckel wrote:I switched from vibratory to stainless and I'll never look back.
I can run 100+ rounds of .45 acp through the thumbler for 4 hours and it comes out brand spankin new. The problem is, as I've found, IT'S TOO CLEAN for a progressive press. The carbon residue left over from firing actually acts as a lubricant in the dies. My SS wet tumbled brass will get "stuck" on the case flaring die in my Dillon Square Deal B.
However, for rifle ammunition, where cleanliness sorta matters, and you're going to be lubing it anyways, I prefer to wet tumble, then polish afterwards with a vibratory.
I have also tried ultrasonic, and it leaves much to be asked for compared to SS tumbling, and also vibratory. VERY low qty of brass to clean at a time, and I haven't seen any real benefits over a good SS wet setup.
I have a question, is the 100 rounds a number you picked, or is that how many that tumbler will let you polish at one time?
Don2
Yea, I just pulled it out of a hat. I honestly have not counted what "max capacity" is. I just throw everything I have in there, and let it go. I would say max capacity is closer to 300-400 .45 acp rounds.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests