Moderator: Charles L. Cotton
mr fixit wrote:How 'bout if we try to open up the options. It would be nice to have the option of a knife, or stun gun, or mace, or even a sawed off shotgun.
I think Florida is like that; if you can conceal it, you can carry it.
Just a thought.
mr fixit wrote:How 'bout if we try to open up the options. It would be nice to have the option of a knife, or stun gun, or mace, or even a sawed off shotgun.
I think Florida is like that; if you can conceal it, you can carry it.
fiftycal wrote:Currently you can carry an "illegal knive" or club with you if you have a CHL and are carrying a handgun. You can carry a "sawed off shotgun" if it is registered under NFA.
dolanp wrote:fiftycal wrote:Currently you can carry an "illegal knive" or club with you if you have a CHL and are carrying a handgun. You can carry a "sawed off shotgun" if it is registered under NFA.
Technically the law does indicate this is true the way it is written, however this is a very legally 'iffy' idea. I would not recommend trying it out.
txinvestigator wrote:dolanp wrote:fiftycal wrote:Currently you can carry an "illegal knive" or club with you if you have a CHL and are carrying a handgun. You can carry a "sawed off shotgun" if it is registered under NFA.
Technically the law does indicate this is true the way it is written, however this is a very legally 'iffy' idea. I would not recommend trying it out.
fiftycal wrote:txinvestigator wrote:dolanp wrote:fiftycal wrote:Currently you can carry an "illegal knive" or club with you if you have a CHL and are carrying a handgun. You can carry a "sawed off shotgun" if it is registered under NFA.
Technically the law does indicate this is true the way it is written, however this is a very legally 'iffy' idea. I would not recommend trying it out.
I know we have had this discussion before, so I will just say this; Every LEO I know will arrest a CHL holder for UCW if they discover an illegal knife or club on or about that CHL holders person.
------------------------------------------------------------------
What is going to be the charge? "Unlawfully carrying a weapon lawfully"? Since 46.02 "does not apply" to someone with a handgun and a CHL what are you going to charge them with?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Right or wrong, how much will it cost to defend yourself in court?
---------------------------------------------------------------------
And what is going to cost a LEO to defend against a Federal civil rights trial, an illegal arrest and a charge of official oppression? Or do you think the cop shop will pay for it?
txinvestigator wrote:Hey fifty, I am not a cop anymore. and if a LEO makes an arrest with good faith he is not going to be charged with any of thise things.
I don't care, as I don't carry a club or illegal knife.
I can tell you that just this morning In my CHL class (on lunch now) a Dallas County Deputy from the academy told us that they WILL arrest a CHL holder who is carrying a club or illegal knife.
Renegade wrote:txinvestigator wrote:Hey fifty, I am not a cop anymore. and if a LEO makes an arrest with good faith he is not going to be charged with any of thise things.
I don't care, as I don't carry a club or illegal knife.
I can tell you that just this morning In my CHL class (on lunch now) a Dallas County Deputy from the academy told us that they WILL arrest a CHL holder who is carrying a club or illegal knife.
I'd call bull on him right there and inform I have such a knife. In fact, I am taking my renewal next week and I will make it a point to carry said knife.
Just because the land is filled with cops who cannot read or do not want to learn the law, does not mean I am going to runaway like scared chicken and give up my rights under the law. When you think of the sacrifices young soldiers are making to protect our rights over in Afghan/Iraq, being saddled with an illegal arrest is nothing. I will gladly step up to the plate. This one is so easy the LEO will be lucky to not go to jail, and I will get 6 figure settlement without even trying. My guess though is his supervisor will be smart enough to be able to read the law and nothing will happen, other than a short detainment.
USMC-COL wrote:Changing the law on printing as long there is no "obviously intentional flashing" would also be nice.
txinvestigator wrote:
His supervisor is the Dallas County Sheriff, and it is policy. IMO, the law is clear, and only handguns are allowed under the CHL laws.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest