Another Post-McDonald Lawsuit - Nevada State Parks

What's going on in Washington, D.C.?

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

Post Reply
User avatar

Topic author
ELB
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 8128
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 9:34 pm
Location: Seguin

Another Post-McDonald Lawsuit - Nevada State Parks

#1

Post by ELB »

Found over at No Lawyers - Only Guns and Money.
This is not the whole post - follow the link and read the whole thing.
In what by my count is the fifth post-McDonald complaint to be filed in Federal court, the Mountain States Legal Foundation filed a lawsuit in the US District Court for Nevada, Northern Division, last week over firearm restrictions in Nevada State Parks.

According to a story in the Las Vegas Sun,

...

In April, Mr. Baker applied for a special use permit for a group campsite at the Wild Horse State Recreation Area north of Elko, NV. His application stated that he planned to possess a loaded firearm in his tent for self-protection. At the beginning of June, he got a response from the State Recreation Area.

"Mr. Baker has been advised that, if he brings a firearm for personal protection, he will be in violation of state law," the legal foundation said.

"Nevada’s ban on firearms prohibits Mr. Baker from possessing a functional firearm when he is camping in Nevada state parks. He must leave his firearm in his car, unloaded at all times, even in the case of a self-defense emergency. If he were to discharge a firearm in self-defense, that action would also violate the ban. The penalty for violating the Nevada firearms ban is six months imprisonment, or a $1,000 fine, or both," the foundation said.
...
This lawsuit is unique in that it argues that a tent is a temporary residence and that the same Second Amendment right that protects the right to a firearm in a residence should apply here. If the Court accepts this argument, then the Second Amendment protections should also apply to stays in hotels, motels, and other lodging as well as a RV in a campground.


...

You can read the complaint below.

Baker v. Biaggi Et Al - Complaint
USAF 1982-2005
____________
User avatar

mgood
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 964
Joined: Wed Feb 06, 2008 9:07 am
Location: Snyder, Texas
Contact:

Re: Another Post-McDonald Lawsuit - Nevada State Parks

#2

Post by mgood »

If the Court accepts this argument, then the Second Amendment protections should also apply to stays in hotels, motels, and other lodging as well as a RV in a campground.
I thought it already did in most places. :headscratch
User avatar

Topic author
ELB
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 8128
Joined: Tue May 22, 2007 9:34 pm
Location: Seguin

Re: Another Post-McDonald Lawsuit - Nevada State Parks

#3

Post by ELB »

mgood wrote:
If the Court accepts this argument, then the Second Amendment protections should also apply to stays in hotels, motels, and other lodging as well as a RV in a campground.
I thought it already did in most places. :headscratch
Remember, until Heller and McDonald, most of the Federal Courts didn't think the 2A applied to anything except maybe a State-organized militia. State constitutions and laws sometimes protected having a gun for SD in various circumstances; for example Texas law regarded RVs, etc, as a habitation the same as your home. On the other hand, NJ doesn't think you should have a gun in your home at all, if they can help it, and they use trivial reasoning to deny many applications. At the Federal level, judges did not think you had a right to a gun at all. SCOTUS has finally told them otherwise.

So, as I see it, this lawsuit is trying to do two things: 1) pound some sense into Nevada's legislature and parks system, and more importantly, 2) establish that the 2A does in fact protect your right to defend yourself somewhere besides your main home.
USAF 1982-2005
____________
Post Reply

Return to “Federal”