It tells you everything you need to know about their character. Principle is less important than other considerations for them. Vote accordingly.G26ster wrote:"Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men." - Lord Actonanygunanywhere wrote:They didn't want to lose their positions of power. Power means everything in DC.G26ster wrote:TAM, I think they did in '64 when Barry Goldwater lost the 1964 presidential election to Lyndon Johnson by "one of the largest landslides in history." And back then, the country was far more conservative than it is now.The Annoyed Man wrote: It's a shame too, because all that the elites would have to do is say "OK, we'll try it once your way" to the party's conservatives.
I still would like to know where the conservatives were in the latest election for Speaker. Only 25 votes against? If conservatives wanted a change, they had a great chance. Seems to me almost everyone was protecting - themselves. The opportunity to send a strong message was lost.
However, there are a heck of a lot more conservatives in congress who are not in positions of power. Where were their votes? And what does that say about the people whose views we agree with now when they are not in power, when we elect them to positions of power?
When you think about what our forefathers put on the line for freedom, the current crop of politicians doesn't compare very well. They may claim they believe in the Constitution. They may even believe in the Constitution. But they lack the courage of their convictions to put everything on the line for it. Only 6% of the House members had the courage to vote for the change that voters obviously demanded in the last election. Depending on who you ask, the Tea Party Caucus has 40 to 60 members. They needed 39 votes to force at least a second vote. 25 voted against Boehner. So perhaps half or even more of the Tea Party Caucus didn't have the courage to vote for a new Speaker, even though Congress was deluged with phone calls and faxes asking them to do just that. Many of them claimed a fear of retribution. Now they are (and even Boehner is) waving their conservative credentials as if it actually means anything after they failed their first test. Boehner just claimed he was the anti-establishment Speaker. How laughable is that?