There probably aren't many 98 pound weaklings on Secret Service protection details. Look what happened to CopOnce at the airport.jimlongley wrote:Must be some awfully strong feds out there these days,
Federal agents are not peace officers right?
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
Re: Federal agents are not peace officers right?
"Ees gun! Ees not safe!"
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 2367
- Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 9:29 am
- Location: Seattle, Washington
Re: Federal agents are not peace officers right?
I'm sure you, personally, get what he was saying, but the point (for everyone else, just in case) is that a machine gun would likely be mounted atop something, or at least have a crew carrying the tripod and/or ammo.
was merely a jest. a gentle ribbing, if you will. I am, however, in no way speaking for the esteemed Mr Longley, only merely trying to expedite understanding.
was merely a jest. a gentle ribbing, if you will. I am, however, in no way speaking for the esteemed Mr Longley, only merely trying to expedite understanding.
FWIW, IIRC, AFAIK, FTMP, IANAL. YMMV.
Re: Federal agents are not peace officers right?
I'm sorry if using the correct words confused anyone.
But I still think Article 2.122 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure says the feds "shall not be deemed peace officers" in Texas.
But I still think Article 2.122 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure says the feds "shall not be deemed peace officers" in Texas.
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 2
- Posts: 6134
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2005 1:31 pm
- Location: Allen, TX
Re: Federal agents are not peace officers right?
That's a CFR definition, not to be confused with reality.boomerang wrote:I'm sorry if using the correct words confused anyone.
But I still think Article 2.122 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure says the feds "shall not be deemed peace officers" in Texas.
Real gun control, carrying 24/7/365
-
- Senior Member
- Posts in topic: 1
- Posts: 766
- Joined: Fri Jun 01, 2007 11:27 am
- Location: Plano
- Contact:
Re: Federal agents are not peace officers right?
Ok, then how about the English definition? In other words, the definition that is correct when you say "machine gun"?jimlongley wrote:That's a CFR definition, not to be confused with reality.boomerang wrote:I'm sorry if using the correct words confused anyone.
But I still think Article 2.122 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure says the feds "shall not be deemed peace officers" in Texas.
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/machine%20gun" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;