Renegade wrote:Don't do that or you will end up with a 30.06 sign instead of a 51 sign.Kalrog wrote: Did you ask that they explain the rules to the rink operator?
The law really does not address two businesses sharing the exact same premises. Thus I see where TABC is coming from. The solution seems to be outlined by srothstein, to force the bar to define its premises differently from the rink. They may not want to do that, as many rinks operate "adult night", and want to sell/possess alcohol at the rink.
I don't think they can post 30.06 as the building is owned, in part, by the city and is used for public meetings etc. I'm not sure what the exact ownership arrangement of the building is. Another thing I will have to check out.
Thanks for all the help!