No where in my post did I refer to anything as being childish. This rebuttal of yours just follows the trend of all the other posts you have made in some vain and arrogant attempt to force feed your point. Your argument is far from logical.brianko wrote:The converse of your argument is that those of us who believe additional training is necessary to protect our children are somehow "childish" in our way of thinking, and are guilty of harboring "teacher-like" thoughts when it comes to how to best protect our charges.anygunanywhere wrote: Stop thinking like a teacher and start thinking like a free, rational individual who fully intends to defend their life and the life of those they love. Be more of an adult and parent.
I think any logical thread that may have existed in this discussion has finally met a grisly, undignified end. There's simply no way to debate such a baseless argument.
The bottom line truth is that no one should ever be forced to obtain any additional training to exercise a right. You can not put forth an argument counter to this that is reasoned and logical. The logic that supports this truth is called PERSONAL RESPONSIBILITY. Personal responsibility is inseparable from rights.
Anygunanywhere