Cinemark "no guns allowed"

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar

03Lightningrocks
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 11451
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 5:15 pm
Location: Plano

Re: Cinemark "no guns allowed"

#61

Post by 03Lightningrocks »

chasfm11 wrote: Tue Dec 21, 2021 10:18 pm
philip964 wrote: Tue Dec 21, 2021 9:08 pm Ok educate me what is a 30.05 sign?
It is to unlicensed people what 30:06 is to those with an LTC. It is a response to Texas passing Constitutional Carry.
I would be willing to bet that 90% or more of the folks carrying under constitutional carry have no idea what that sign means. Or even to look for it.

chasfm11
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 6
Posts: 4141
Joined: Thu Apr 15, 2010 4:01 pm
Location: Northern DFW

Re: Cinemark "no guns allowed"

#62

Post by chasfm11 »

03Lightningrocks wrote: Tue Dec 21, 2021 10:21 pm
chasfm11 wrote: Tue Dec 21, 2021 10:18 pm
philip964 wrote: Tue Dec 21, 2021 9:08 pm Ok educate me what is a 30.05 sign?
It is to unlicensed people what 30:06 is to those with an LTC. It is a response to Texas passing Constitutional Carry.
I would be willing to bet that 90% or more of the folks carrying under constitutional carry have no idea what that sign means. Or even to look for it.
I'm not sure that I agree. I understand your point - without some sort of formal setting with required attendance, the chances of the dispersal of the information about the 30.05 sign are random. OTOH, the announcement of Constitutional Carry itself was pretty random. Only those with a specific interest in following it know about it. The news media didn't exactly blare the new law from the rooftops. Those that were following the passage likely know about the sign.

Texas has had a law which requires drivers of motor homes heavier than 26,000lbs to have a special driver's license Not all of them do. Some estimates are that 50% of the people that own those vehicles don't know about the special license requirement. I don't know of anyone who was ever cited for non-compliance. In the one time that I've been stopped by the police while driving our RV (which is lighter than the requirement and doesn't need the special incense) the officer during his rant about my driving a "30,000 pound vehicle" recklessly, didn't check my license to see if I had the Class B non-CDL that is required for the weight that he accused me have having. When the law is not understood by either the affected group nor the people who are supposed to enforce it, the chances of compliance are also random. The 30.05 sign will l only become a problem when someone tries something open carrying in a posted place, is detected and the police are called. Otherwise, concealed is concealed.
6/23-8/13/10 -51 days to plastic
Dum Spiro, Spero
User avatar

J.R.@A&M
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 865
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 12:41 pm

Re: Cinemark "no guns allowed"

#63

Post by J.R.@A&M »

chasfm11 wrote: Tue Dec 21, 2021 10:18 pm
philip964 wrote: Tue Dec 21, 2021 9:08 pm Ok educate me what is a 30.05 sign?
It is to unlicensed people what 30:06 is to those with an LTC. It is a response to Texas passing Constitutional Carry.
And it looked like this: https://www.mysecuritysign.com/firearm- ... 1766921306 .
“Always liked me a sidearm with some heft.” Boss Spearman in Open Range.

powerboatr
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 2273
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:53 pm
Location: North East Texas

Re: Cinemark "no guns allowed"

#64

Post by powerboatr »

chasfm11 wrote: Wed Dec 22, 2021 6:58 am
03Lightningrocks wrote: Tue Dec 21, 2021 10:21 pm
chasfm11 wrote: Tue Dec 21, 2021 10:18 pm
philip964 wrote: Tue Dec 21, 2021 9:08 pm Ok educate me what is a 30.05 sign?
It is to unlicensed people what 30:06 is to those with an LTC. It is a response to Texas passing Constitutional Carry.
I would be willing to bet that 90% or more of the folks carrying under constitutional carry have no idea what that sign means. Or even to look for it.
I'm not sure that I agree. I understand your point - without some sort of formal setting with required attendance, the chances of the dispersal of the information about the 30.05 sign are random. OTOH, the announcement of Constitutional Carry itself was pretty random. Only those with a specific interest in following it know about it. The news media didn't exactly blare the new law from the rooftops. Those that were following the passage likely know about the sign.

Texas has had a law which requires drivers of motor homes heavier than 26,000lbs to have a special driver's license Not all of them do. Some estimates are that 50% of the people that own those vehicles don't know about the special license requirement. I don't know of anyone who was ever cited for non-compliance. In the one time that I've been stopped by the police while driving our RV (which is lighter than the requirement and doesn't need the special incense) the officer during his rant about my driving a "30,000 pound vehicle" recklessly, didn't check my license to see if I had the Class B non-CDL that is required for the weight that he accused me have having. When the law is not understood by either the affected group nor the people who are supposed to enforce it, the chances of compliance are also random. The 30.05 sign will l only become a problem when someone tries something open carrying in a posted place, is detected and the police are called. Otherwise, concealed is concealed.
i have one of them class b no cdl. it knocked dollars off my insurance for my 32k motorhome.
i agree there are a many folks who constitutionally carry have no idea what the law says,
i have a neighbor behind me with a friend that started carrying as soon as the law passed the senate...he had zero idea on details, he heard it on the news
Proud to have served for over 22 Years in the U.S. Navy Certificated FAA A&P technician since 1996

Deitz83
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 300
Joined: Fri Jul 17, 2015 3:05 pm
Location: Dallas, Texas

Re: Cinemark "no guns allowed"

#65

Post by Deitz83 »

powerboatr wrote: Wed Dec 22, 2021 12:18 pm
chasfm11 wrote: Wed Dec 22, 2021 6:58 am
03Lightningrocks wrote: Tue Dec 21, 2021 10:21 pm
chasfm11 wrote: Tue Dec 21, 2021 10:18 pm
philip964 wrote: Tue Dec 21, 2021 9:08 pm Ok educate me what is a 30.05 sign?
It is to unlicensed people what 30:06 is to those with an LTC. It is a response to Texas passing Constitutional Carry.
I would be willing to bet that 90% or more of the folks carrying under constitutional carry have no idea what that sign means. Or even to look for it.
I'm not sure that I agree. I understand your point - without some sort of formal setting with required attendance, the chances of the dispersal of the information about the 30.05 sign are random. OTOH, the announcement of Constitutional Carry itself was pretty random. Only those with a specific interest in following it know about it. The news media didn't exactly blare the new law from the rooftops. Those that were following the passage likely know about the sign.

Texas has had a law which requires drivers of motor homes heavier than 26,000lbs to have a special driver's license Not all of them do. Some estimates are that 50% of the people that own those vehicles don't know about the special license requirement. I don't know of anyone who was ever cited for non-compliance. In the one time that I've been stopped by the police while driving our RV (which is lighter than the requirement and doesn't need the special incense) the officer during his rant about my driving a "30,000 pound vehicle" recklessly, didn't check my license to see if I had the Class B non-CDL that is required for the weight that he accused me have having. When the law is not understood by either the affected group nor the people who are supposed to enforce it, the chances of compliance are also random. The 30.05 sign will l only become a problem when someone tries something open carrying in a posted place, is detected and the police are called. Otherwise, concealed is concealed.
i have one of them class b no cdl. it knocked dollars off my insurance for my 32k motorhome.
i agree there are a many folks who constitutionally carry have no idea what the law says,
i have a neighbor behind me with a friend that started carrying as soon as the law passed the senate...he had zero idea on details, he heard it on the news
I agree.

cyphertext
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 689
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 11:31 am

Re: Cinemark "no guns allowed"

#66

Post by cyphertext »

powerboatr wrote: Wed Dec 22, 2021 12:18 pm
i have one of them class b no cdl. it knocked dollars off my insurance for my 32k motorhome.
i agree there are a many folks who constitutionally carry have no idea what the law says,
i have a neighbor behind me with a friend that started carrying as soon as the law passed the senate...he had zero idea on details, he heard it on the news
Yep, have heard several folks say that signs don't apply anymore because we have constitutional carry.

powerboatr
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 2273
Joined: Mon Mar 23, 2009 9:53 pm
Location: North East Texas

Re: Cinemark "no guns allowed"

#67

Post by powerboatr »

cyphertext wrote: Wed Dec 22, 2021 4:30 pm
powerboatr wrote: Wed Dec 22, 2021 12:18 pm
i have one of them class b no cdl. it knocked dollars off my insurance for my 32k motorhome.
i agree there are a many folks who constitutionally carry have no idea what the law says,
i have a neighbor behind me with a friend that started carrying as soon as the law passed the senate...he had zero idea on details, he heard it on the news
Yep, have heard several folks say that signs don't apply anymore because we have constitutional carry.
oh yes
and the guy i know is a walking box of rocks..he is the typical " i know everything" he carries a revolver in a loose old west type holster on his motorcycle,
i tried to talk to him about the law and signs, but he knows everything and i was wrong :totap:
Proud to have served for over 22 Years in the U.S. Navy Certificated FAA A&P technician since 1996
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”