City owned building has a Texas Penal Code 30.05

CHL discussions that do not fit into more specific topics

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

Post Reply

Topic author
Chuck222
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2015 3:02 pm

City owned building has a Texas Penal Code 30.05

#1

Post by Chuck222 »

City of Dallas has a sign on one of it buildings. Is this breaking the law?

https://www.dropbox.com/s/5m03tsqfheirz ... 8.jpg?dl=0" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
User avatar

Keith B
Moderator
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 18494
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 3:29 pm

Re: City owned building has a Texas Penal Code 30.05

#2

Post by Keith B »

Chuck222 wrote:City of Dallas has a sign on one of it buildings. Is this breaking the law?

https://www.dropbox.com/s/5m03tsqfheirz ... 8.jpg?dl=0" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Welcome to the forum.

If you are refereing to the new law passed making it illegal to post a 30.06 sign, then that is not in effect until 9/1/2015. However, even after that date it will not be illegal to post a 30.05 sign on a government building. And, 30.05 does not apply to a CHL holder just due to the fact they are carrying a concealed weapon.
TEX PE. CODE ANN. § 30.05 : Texas Statutes - Section 30.05: CRIMINAL TRESPASS

(a) A person commits an offense if he enters or remains on or in property, including an aircraft or other vehicle, of another without effective consent or he enters or remains in a building of another without effective consent and he:

..........

(f) It is a defense to prosecution under this section that:

(1) the basis on which entry on the property or land or in the building was forbidden is that entry with a handgun was forbidden; and

(2) the person was carrying a concealed handgun and a license issued under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code, to carry a concealed handgun of the same category the person was carrying.


......
Keith
Texas LTC Instructor, Missouri CCW Instructor, NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun Instructor and RSO, NRA Life Member

Psalm 82:3-4

Topic author
Chuck222
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2015 3:02 pm

Re: City owned building has a Texas Penal Code 30.05

#3

Post by Chuck222 »

Thanks for replying. The signs reads as follows. Caring a firearm on these premises is prohibited
This includes persons licensed to carry a concealed handgun pursuant to state law. Carry a firearm on these premises is a Class A misdemeanor, punishable by up to 1 year in jail and a $4,000 fine. Texas Penal Code, section 30.05. The building is a Water meter shop that has offices and wear house area. Will this sign be breaking the law in September 1 2015.
User avatar

Keith B
Moderator
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 18494
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 3:29 pm

Re: City owned building has a Texas Penal Code 30.05

#4

Post by Keith B »

Chuck222 wrote:Thanks for replying. The signs reads as follows. Caring a firearm on these premises is prohibited
This includes persons licensed to carry a concealed handgun pursuant to state law. Carry a firearm on these premises is a Class A misdemeanor, punishable by up to 1 year in jail and a $4,000 fine. Texas Penal Code, section 30.05. The building is a Water meter shop that has offices and wear house area. Will this sign be breaking the law in September 1 2015.
Actually, it will be since it refers to a concealed license holder on the sign. Here is the bill text https://legiscan.com/TX/text/SB273/id/1 ... olled.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
S.B. No. 273

AN ACT
relating to certain offenses relating to carrying concealed
handguns on property owned or leased by a governmental entity;
providing a civil penalty.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
SECTION 1. Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code, is
amended by adding Section 411.209 to read as follows:
Sec. 411.209. WRONGFUL EXCLUSION OF CONCEALED HANDGUN
LICENSE HOLDER. (a) A state agency or a political subdivision of
the state may not provide notice by a communication described by
Section 30.06, Penal Code, or by any sign expressly referring to
that law or to a concealed handgun license
, that a license holder
carrying a handgun under the authority of this subchapter is
prohibited from entering or remaining on a premises or other place
owned or leased by the governmental entity unless license holders
are prohibited from carrying a handgun on the premises or other
place by Section 46.03 or 46.035, Penal Code....
Keith
Texas LTC Instructor, Missouri CCW Instructor, NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun Instructor and RSO, NRA Life Member

Psalm 82:3-4

Topic author
Chuck222
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2015 3:02 pm

Re: City owned building has a Texas Penal Code 30.05

#5

Post by Chuck222 »

Thanks!

o b juan
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 427
Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2013 12:44 pm

Re: City owned building has a Texas Penal Code 30.05

#6

Post by o b juan »

since the OC is now on will they have to go into the they law and make an attorney generals ruling to drop out Concealed Becase licenses, we are advised on this sit it is now LTC ?
CHL Instructor since 95'/ School safety Since Jan 17' :patriot:

Topic author
Chuck222
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2015 3:02 pm

Re: City owned building has a Texas Penal Code 30.05

#7

Post by Chuck222 »

I wonder if this new law will apply to me if I'm a city employee with a CHL.
User avatar

txglock21
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 772
Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2013 11:39 am
Location: Garland, TX.

Re: City owned building has a Texas Penal Code 30.05

#8

Post by txglock21 »

Chuck222 wrote:I wonder if this new law will apply to me if I'm a city employee with a CHL.
The law will not, but employee policy could get you fired. I'm in that situation now. Any "Joe CHL" off the street can carry inside our water dept., but as a city employee, I can't. (per city directive) :banghead:
"Laugh about everything or cry about nothing."
NRA Life Member & TSRA Member/ Former USAF
User avatar

mojo84
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 9043
Joined: Tue Jun 21, 2011 4:07 pm
Location: Boerne, TX (Kendall County)

Re: City owned building has a Texas Penal Code 30.05

#9

Post by mojo84 »

o b juan wrote:since the OC is now on will they have to go into the they law and make an attorney generals ruling to drop out Concealed Becase licenses, we are advised on this sit it is now LTC ?
What? :headscratch
Note: Me sharing a link and information published by others does not constitute my endorsement, agreement, disagreement, my opinion or publishing by me. If you do not like what is contained at a link I share, take it up with the author or publisher of the content.
User avatar

Mel
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 593
Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2010 5:47 pm
Location: Farmersville, TX

Re: City owned building has a Texas Penal Code 30.05

#10

Post by Mel »

Chuck222 wrote:Thanks for replying. The signs reads as follows. Caring a firearm on these premises is prohibited
This includes persons licensed to carry a concealed handgun pursuant to state law. Carry a firearm on these premises is a Class A misdemeanor, punishable by up to 1 year in jail and a $4,000 fine. Texas Penal Code, section 30.05. The building is a Water meter shop that has offices and wear house area. Will this sign be breaking the law in September 1 2015.
They have installed the same signs on the terminal building at Dallas Executive Airport.
As I understand the law, these signs are not enforceable.
Mel
Airworthiness Inspector specializing in Experimental and Light-Sport Aircraft since the last Century.

Topic author
Chuck222
Junior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 5
Joined: Thu Jul 23, 2015 3:02 pm

Re: City owned building has a Texas Penal Code 30.05

#11

Post by Chuck222 »

Thanks for clarifying this.

MeMelYup
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1874
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2010 3:21 pm

Re: City owned building has a Texas Penal Code 30.05

#12

Post by MeMelYup »

If they are quoting or implying 30.05 the sign is bogus. If a person reads section f of 30.05 it states:
(f) It is a defense to prosecution under this section that:
(1) the basis on which entry on the property or land or in the building was forbidden is that entry with a handgun was forbidden; and
(2) the person was carrying a concealed handgun and a license issued under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code, to carry a concealed handgun.
Guys, please get a copy of CHL 16 and read it. http://www.txdps.state.tx.us/internetfo ... chl-16.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The latest one available is not updated yet, but is still worth the read.

mr1337
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1201
Joined: Thu Apr 03, 2014 12:17 pm
Location: Austin

Re: City owned building has a Texas Penal Code 30.05

#13

Post by mr1337 »

MeMelYup wrote:If they are quoting or implying 30.05 the sign is bogus. If a person reads section f of 30.05 it states:
(f) It is a defense to prosecution under this section that:
(1) the basis on which entry on the property or land or in the building was forbidden is that entry with a handgun was forbidden; and
(2) the person was carrying a concealed handgun and a license issued under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code, to carry a concealed handgun.
Guys, please get a copy of CHL 16 and read it. http://www.txdps.state.tx.us/internetfo ... chl-16.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The latest one available is not updated yet, but is still worth the read.
Which means you could still get arrested for it. It would get thrown out in a heartbeat by any comparable judge.

As they say, you can beat the rap, but you can't beat the ride.
Keep calm and carry.

Licensing (n.) - When government takes away your right to do something and sells it back to you.

chandler583
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 54
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 11:25 am
Location: Houston, TX

Re: City owned building has a Texas Penal Code 30.05

#14

Post by chandler583 »

I certainly hope the officer that responds would know that it is a bogus sign.It's a quasi 30.05 sign that is also trying to wrap license holders into it.
10/17/12 Docs Mailed
11/29/12 Plastic in Hand
User avatar

ScottDLS
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 5052
Joined: Sun Jun 26, 2005 1:04 am
Location: DFW Area, TX

Re: City owned building has a Texas Penal Code 30.05

#15

Post by ScottDLS »

mr1337 wrote:
MeMelYup wrote:If they are quoting or implying 30.05 the sign is bogus. If a person reads section f of 30.05 it states:
(f) It is a defense to prosecution under this section that:
(1) the basis on which entry on the property or land or in the building was forbidden is that entry with a handgun was forbidden; and
(2) the person was carrying a concealed handgun and a license issued under Subchapter H, Chapter 411, Government Code, to carry a concealed handgun.
Guys, please get a copy of CHL 16 and read it. http://www.txdps.state.tx.us/internetfo ... chl-16.pdf" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The latest one available is not updated yet, but is still worth the read.
Which means you could still get arrested for it. It would get thrown out in a heartbeat by any comparable judge.

As they say, you can beat the rap, but you can't beat the ride.
As you could for carrying a handgun under your CHL anywhere, since the 46.15 exception has been ruled to be a Defense to Prosecution. Wait till open carry 1/1/2016 we'll have massive numbers of Texas LTC holders "taking the ride". Also, will be blood in the streets. :biggrinjester:
4/13/1996 Completed CHL Class, 4/16/1996 Fingerprints, Affidavits, and Application Mailed, 10/4/1996 Received CHL, renewed 1998, 2002, 2006, 2011, 2016...). "ATF... Uhhh...heh...heh....Alcohol, tobacco, and GUNS!! Cool!!!!"
Post Reply

Return to “General Texas CHL Discussion”