AndyC,AndyC wrote:Well, legally I could have shot - South Africa has (or had) a category of crimes called Schedule 1 Offences (eg murder, rape, armed robbery, theft, forgery, etc) for which one may shoot (and perhaps) kill the criminal if it were otherwise impossible to perform a citizen's arrest. I'd long before decided, however, that I wouldn't shoot anyone solely because it was "legal" - there are higher standards to which I subscribe.C-dub wrote:That is commendable, Andy, and shows a clear head and an honorable man. I wouldn't shoot anyone over a radio or a few simple things either. Unfortunately, there are many who would and I think the law, today (9.42), says that if you believe there is no reasonable expectation to recover the stolen property that deadly force may be used. You would not have been justified to recover her property, but unless I'm wrong you would be justified today to recover your property.
Thanks for the clear head comment, but it's not totally accurate. The technique called visualisation is a very valuable facet of self-defence preparation to me (playing the "what if" game with yourself for various scenarios eg "if he does this, what would I do and what would then happen" kind of thing) - and I'd already played out that kind of scenario mentally long beforehand and was psychologically more prepared for it than I perhaps otherwise would have been
Having been in a vaguely similar situation and having done exactly the same thing, I would say that trigger-aware is better than trigger-happy.