Including his ability to think rationally about guns and the bill of rights.Hoi Polloi wrote:He did lose quite a lot.
His personal tragedy, no matter how large or small, does not give him the right to victimize us.
Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton
Including his ability to think rationally about guns and the bill of rights.Hoi Polloi wrote:He did lose quite a lot.
The paragraph was my paraphrase from numerous interviews, articles, statements, etc like the below.WildBill wrote:Did he actually say this?Hoi Polloi wrote:Whatever his feelings were then, he is now grieving the opportunity for marriage and children with the love of his life.WildBill wrote:That was my point. I am sure that Mr. Woods feels a sense of loss and would feel that way about any person who he personally knew.Jasonw560 wrote:But after just 6 months of she and I dating, I don't know if my feelings about it would have been that strong.
Yes, I saw this video.Hoi Polloi wrote:The paragraph was my paraphrase from numerous interviews, articles, statements, etc like the below.
He said they were friends throughout college, were in martial arts training together, and started dating in their senior year 6 months before the shooting. “I loved her, and I never told her that, so I’m putting it on the record here today.”
These types of statements about grief, terror, lost love, etc is what he's saying about his feelings. I had not read at that time, but have now read, that some question whether or not they had a steady dating relationship and if that contest of his use of the term girlfriend was the reason he moved to calling her "the girl he loved." None of this matters to me as attacking his feelings is not productive and is unable to be resolved. Much better to discuss the actual issues and not the man.
Well said.WildBill wrote:\
At the heart of the matter is how this tragedy is being presented to the public. In my opinion Mr. Woods statements and testimony go beyond just the issue of campus carry. Rather than expressing his own feelings and representing himself, I believe that Mr. Woods is an opportunist who has become a minor celebrity by being manipulated by groups who have an anti-gun agenda.
Rumor is Gallegos has a CHL. He voted against campus carry last time but at least he thought it deserved to be debated in 2009. Does anyone know what changed?Jasonw560 wrote:I just read the whole thing. Very insightful. To be truthful, it might work if Kory or austinrealtor or someone else opens a dialog and invites Gallegos or Van de Putte or West or Lucio to the range. I don't think think they're the Schumer/Feinstein types.