Officer pepper sprays lawbreakers - blame begins

Topics that do not fit anywhere else. Absolutely NO discussions of religion, race, or immigration!

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar

olafpfj
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 7
Posts: 661
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2010 12:03 pm
Location: Grapevine

Re: Officer pepper sprays lawbreakers - blame begins

#16

Post by olafpfj »

gigag04 wrote:"Compliance tools" are a loosing battle when it comes to 4th amendment seizures. You didnt listen to me so I'm going to Hurt you is just plain bad, and looks worse. I prefer a strategically placed hand or finger (google transport wrist lock or mandibular angle) for less violent and equally as effective methods to gain control.

Escalating up and down a use of force continuum with a violator is generally the appropriate response.
The vast majority of videos showing police using pepper spray show them using it at as a punishment rather than a "compliance tool". With all these new tools, tasers and the like, people are often not even given a chance to comply with any orders. Now these protesters were well warned but I think that since they showed no signs of active resistance, there should have been the attempt to physically remove them first. If the protesters had then actively fought with the officers I could see justification for using a more hands off approach to complience such as tasers or pepper spray.

If you really want to see a way out of proportion response to a protest take a look at the anything from Pittsburg. I believe they got in trouble for their shirts that read "We get up early to beat the crowds".

My take on the video though...I think this officer actually behaved quite reasonably and professionally and is the victim of bad policy and sensationalized media.
"If you have ten thousand regulations you destroy all respect for the law." -Winston Churchill
User avatar

Oldgringo
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 11203
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 10:15 pm
Location: Pineywoods of east Texas

Re: Officer pepper sprays lawbreakers - blame begins

#17

Post by Oldgringo »

'Bull' Connors used fire hoses and police dogs to move demonstrators back in the day. What's the difference between then and now?

An unlawful demonstration is an unlawful demonstration...right?

Reloader
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 354
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: East Texas

Re: Officer pepper sprays lawbreakers - blame begins

#18

Post by Reloader »

should have shot a couple..no sympathy from me. let the flames begin..
NRA Life Member
NRA Instructor
Amateur radio Instructor, VE KE5LDO
Tarleton State University '74
User avatar

Topic author
OldCannon
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 11
Posts: 3058
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 11:19 am
Location: Converse, TX

Re: Officer pepper sprays lawbreakers - blame begins

#19

Post by OldCannon »

olafpfj wrote: Now these protesters were well warned but I think that since they showed no signs of active resistance, there should have been the attempt to physically remove them first.
Actually, they all had tightly-interlocked arms to prevent individuals from being physically removed. Any physical force would have required significant (read that: pain/injury-inducing) contact of many participating officers working to "unlock" a determined, adrenaline-rushed group of people. Pepper spray was, IMHO, the right solution.

As I said, the protesters staged the entire incident for physical confrontation and propaganda-generation, and succeeded.
I don't fear guns; I fear voters and politicians that fear guns.
User avatar

Topic author
OldCannon
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 11
Posts: 3058
Joined: Sun Jan 17, 2010 11:19 am
Location: Converse, TX

Re: Officer pepper sprays lawbreakers - blame begins

#20

Post by OldCannon »

(Deleted my comment out of courtesy to Reloader's request)
Last edited by OldCannon on Mon Nov 21, 2011 3:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I don't fear guns; I fear voters and politicians that fear guns.
User avatar

olafpfj
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 7
Posts: 661
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2010 12:03 pm
Location: Grapevine

Re: Officer pepper sprays lawbreakers - blame begins

#21

Post by olafpfj »

OldCannon wrote:
olafpfj wrote: Now these protesters were well warned but I think that since they showed no signs of active resistance, there should have been the attempt to physically remove them first.
Actually, they all had tightly-interlocked arms to prevent individuals from being physically removed. Any physical force would have required significant (read that: pain/injury-inducing) contact of many participating officers working to "unlock" a determined, adrenaline-rushed group of people. Pepper spray was, IMHO, the right solution.

As I said, the protesters staged the entire incident for physical confrontation and propaganda-generation, and succeeded.
I said "attempt". Even after the pepper spray though, they still have to go in and physically manhandle them outta there. In this case I don't see the pepper spray accomplishing anything but bad P.R. and the police getting their pound of flesh a little easier.

On another note I keep getting the impression that pepper spray is pretty ineffective against a determined individual. The anti's who tout it as an alternative to a firearm should take note.
"If you have ten thousand regulations you destroy all respect for the law." -Winston Churchill
User avatar

The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 26796
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: Officer pepper sprays lawbreakers - blame begins

#22

Post by The Annoyed Man »

olafpfj wrote:
OldCannon wrote:
olafpfj wrote: Now these protesters were well warned but I think that since they showed no signs of active resistance, there should have been the attempt to physically remove them first.
Actually, they all had tightly-interlocked arms to prevent individuals from being physically removed. Any physical force would have required significant (read that: pain/injury-inducing) contact of many participating officers working to "unlock" a determined, adrenaline-rushed group of people. Pepper spray was, IMHO, the right solution.

As I said, the protesters staged the entire incident for physical confrontation and propaganda-generation, and succeeded.
I said "attempt". Even after the pepper spray though, they still have to go in and physically manhandle them outta there. In this case I don't see the pepper spray accomplishing anything but bad P.R. and the police getting their pound of flesh a little easier.

On another note I keep getting the impression that pepper spray is pretty ineffective against a determined individual. The anti's who tout it as an alternative to a firearm should take note.
You can pepper spray someone that's on PCP until your can runs dry and all it will do is make your own life harder. As far as this protest goes and the strategy of interlocking arms, police could have just tazed any two side by side protestors, and their interlocked arms strategy falls apart. Then you wade in and start carrying people off. Only two protestors get zapped, the ones on either side of them let go so as to not get jolted, nobody gets hurt, two people feel the pain of being tazed. Everybody gets to go home unhurt that night except for those students whose parents say, "no, the price of independence is that you are responsible for the consequences of your actions.....not me."
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT

knotquiteawake
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 772
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2011 9:18 am
Location: Rowlett, TX

Re: Officer pepper sprays lawbreakers - blame begins

#23

Post by knotquiteawake »

for the Taser to work they would have to physically attach one lead to one protester at one side and the other lead to the protester at the other side to complete the circuit. Also, everyone in between is going to feel that jolt and it hurts like somethin' else. We tested this when I got certified for taser use at a previous job.
User avatar

The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 5
Posts: 26796
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: Officer pepper sprays lawbreakers - blame begins

#24

Post by The Annoyed Man »

knotquiteawake wrote:for the Taser to work they would have to physically attach one lead to one protester at one side and the other lead to the protester at the other side to complete the circuit. Also, everyone in between is going to feel that jolt and it hurts like somethin' else. We tested this when I got certified for taser use at a previous job.
Better yet!
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT

RPB
Banned
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 8697
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: Officer pepper sprays lawbreakers - blame begins

#25

Post by RPB »

I didn't get the story details

Is this the same group of students who complained about someone loaning them money for college now complaining that someone gave them free condiments? If so, tough crowd to please.
I'm no lawyer

"Never show your hole card" "Always have something in reserve"

bayouhazard
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 823
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 2:30 pm
Location: Wild West Houston

Re: Officer pepper sprays lawbreakers - blame begins

#26

Post by bayouhazard »

RPB wrote:I didn't get the story details

Is this the same group of students who complained about someone loaning them money for college now complaining that someone gave them free condiments? If so, tough crowd to please.
They're not complaining about getting the loan. They're complaining that the greedy widows and orphans who loaned the money expect to be paid back.

As far as condiments. Those wimps couldn't handle anything more zesty than mayo.

Reloader
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 354
Joined: Thu Dec 28, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: East Texas

Re: Officer pepper sprays lawbreakers - blame begins

#27

Post by Reloader »

Please delete my post.
NRA Life Member
NRA Instructor
Amateur radio Instructor, VE KE5LDO
Tarleton State University '74
User avatar

suthdj
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 2296
Joined: Mon Apr 20, 2009 8:49 pm
Location: North Ft Worth(Alliance area)

Re: Officer pepper sprays lawbreakers - blame begins

#28

Post by suthdj »

gigag04 wrote:"Compliance tools" are a loosing battle when it comes to 4th amendment seizures. You didnt listen to me so I'm going to Hurt you is just plain bad, and looks worse. I prefer a strategically placed hand or finger (google transport wrist lock or mandibular angle) for less violent and equally as effective methods to gain control.

Escalating up and down a use of force continuum with a violator is generally the appropriate response.
This I can agree with, there should be a warning then a attempt to physically persuade, then move on to pressure points, wrist locks, arm bars, etc ... and at this point if they resist by all means pepper spay to get needed results and not a blanketed spray grab a head, expose face spray into face(know your target).
21-Apr-09 filed online
05-Sep-09 Plastic Arrived
09-Sep-13 Plastic Arrived
21-june-18 Plasic Arrived
User avatar

gigag04
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 5474
Joined: Wed May 04, 2005 7:47 pm
Location: Houston

Re: Officer pepper sprays lawbreakers - blame begins

#29

Post by gigag04 »

I've had people cling to things to avoid being arrested. Employing an intermediate weapon to answer defensive resistance is lazy. There are all sorts of seemingly innocent looking places to touch that can make even the most determined resistance fold.
Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work. - Thomas Edison
User avatar

olafpfj
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 7
Posts: 661
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2010 12:03 pm
Location: Grapevine

Re: Officer pepper sprays lawbreakers - blame begins

#30

Post by olafpfj »

gigag04 wrote:I've had people cling to things to avoid being arrested. Employing an intermediate weapon to answer defensive resistance is lazy. There are all sorts of seemingly innocent looking places to touch that can make even the most determined resistance fold.
That's what I was getting at. The lazy aspect of taser and pepper spray use. LEO is a physical job just like construction and much of the stage hand work I do. If people had the slightest clue how much back breaking goes into setting up a show no one would ever want to be a Roadie. Speaking of which I have a piano to move and much like a protester it ain't gonna move itself.
"If you have ten thousand regulations you destroy all respect for the law." -Winston Churchill
Post Reply

Return to “Off-Topic”