TexasCHLforum.com

This poll was put up for one of two reasons. One, to actually get folks to make a "compromise" (concession). Or two, to get the result we have had on here...that basically NONE of us are going to find either one of those choices to be acceptable. If those liberal-progressives want to live in a "gun free society", let them emigrate to the UK or Australia. I refuse to vote as well.

Surprised to see that everyone is so wishy-washy and willing to give up all their guns!

I agree..neither. However, for some reason the vote wasnt showing so I voted just to see. Mine doesnt count.

Where is none of the above are acceptable!

I will give up my ammo one bullet at a time to save both.

Neither. Period

Just had to quote my lady friend when I read the poll to her..."I'm not giving up <expletive>"

Wes wrote:Just had to quote my lady friend when I read the poll to her..."I'm not giving up <expletive>"

I would like to see both bans killed. In fact, I would like to see NFA overturned by a Supreme Court that actually reads the Constitution, but we have to be realistic. I'll be hanged if I'd rather see no semiautomatic firearms protected because I was too politically unrealistic to make myself cowboy up and make a choice to do things in a certain strategic order.

Wes wrote:Just had to quote my lady friend when I read the poll to her..."I'm not giving up <expletive>"

Does your lady friend have a sister?

Lol, no but she got a good chuckle out of that.

3. none of the above

The only change I favor is repealing the ban on gun free zones. That was an idiotic idea when it was enacted, has contributed to the death of untold dozens since and needs to be done away with. Next week would not be too soon.

Nope, not casting a vote on that. No Deal, No Way, No How. Ain't gonna happen.

This poll is very scary to me. At this lost there are nine so far who are willing to give in.

Neither is acceptable.