City dwellers: "wealth-adjusted" community utopias coming

Topics that do not fit anywhere else. Absolutely NO discussions of religion, race, or immigration!

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar

Topic author
VMI77
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 6096
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 5:49 pm
Location: Victoria, Texas

City dwellers: "wealth-adjusted" community utopias coming

#1

Post by VMI77 »

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-06-1 ... ally-plan-
According to The Hill, the administration is moving forward with regulations designed to help diversify America’s wealthier neighborhoods, such as building affordable housing in more affluent areas.

The official title of Obama's latest proposal to have the government centrally-plan your community: The Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing rule, a name that only the person who penned the US Freedom Act could have come up with.

The underlying motive: "unfair" segregation sprinkled with a hint of latent racist guilt. "

A final Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) rule due out this month is aimed at ending decades of deep-rooted segregation around the country. “HUD is working with communities across the country to fulfill the promise of equal opportunity for all,” a HUD spokeswoman said. “The proposed policy seeks to break down barriers to access to opportunity in communities supported by HUD funds.”
"Wealthier" doesn't mean like where John Corrazine and his Wall Street pals hang out. But hey, maybe as anygun is fond of saying, the GOP will save you "rlol" .

Edited to add....this just in:
BREAKING: House Democrats delivered a stinging defeat to President Obama’s trade agenda when a vast majority voted to derail legislation designed help him advance a sweeping deal with 11 Pacific-rim nations.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/ ... story.html

I may have to start voting Democrat....they're more opposition for Obama than the GOP is. :smilelol5:
"Journalism, n. A job for people who flunked out of STEM courses, enjoy making up stories, and have no detectable integrity or morals."

From the WeaponsMan blog, weaponsman.com
User avatar

Syntyr
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1662
Joined: Wed Jul 29, 2009 3:54 pm
Location: Houston

Re: City dwellers: "wealth-adjusted" community utopias comin

#2

Post by Syntyr »

VMI77 wrote:
BREAKING: House Democrats delivered a stinging defeat to President Obama’s trade agenda when a vast majority voted to derail legislation designed help him advance a sweeping deal with 11 Pacific-rim nations.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/ ... story.html

I may have to start voting Democrat....they're more opposition for Obama than the GOP is. :smilelol5:

Saw that! I shudder to think I might agree with you. Wow :eek6
Syntyr
"Wherever you go... There you are." - Buckaroo Banzai
"Inconceivable!" - Fizzinni
User avatar

anygunanywhere
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 7863
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2005 9:16 am
Location: Richmond, Texas

Re: City dwellers: "wealth-adjusted" community utopias comin

#3

Post by anygunanywhere »

VMI77 wrote:http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-06-1 ... ally-plan-
According to The Hill, the administration is moving forward with regulations designed to help diversify America’s wealthier neighborhoods, such as building affordable housing in more affluent areas.

The official title of Obama's latest proposal to have the government centrally-plan your community: The Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing rule, a name that only the person who penned the US Freedom Act could have come up with.

The underlying motive: "unfair" segregation sprinkled with a hint of latent racist guilt. "

A final Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) rule due out this month is aimed at ending decades of deep-rooted segregation around the country. “HUD is working with communities across the country to fulfill the promise of equal opportunity for all,” a HUD spokeswoman said. “The proposed policy seeks to break down barriers to access to opportunity in communities supported by HUD funds.”
"Wealthier" doesn't mean like where John Corrazine and his Wall Street pals hang out. But hey, maybe as anygun is fond of saying, the GOP will save you "rlol" .

Edited to add....this just in:
BREAKING: House Democrats delivered a stinging defeat to President Obama’s trade agenda when a vast majority voted to derail legislation designed help him advance a sweeping deal with 11 Pacific-rim nations.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/ ... story.html

I may have to start voting Democrat....they're more opposition for Obama than the GOP is. :smilelol5:
o

Does that mean that the progs have gone so far left they made the full circle and are back on the right?

The GOP will save us, won't they? John? Mitch?
"When democracy turns to tyranny, the armed citizen still gets to vote." Mike Vanderboegh

"The Smallest Minority on earth is the individual. Those who deny individual rights cannot claim to be defenders of minorities." – Ayn Rand

BobCat
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 911
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: East Bernard, TX

Re: City dwellers: "wealth-adjusted" community utopias comin

#4

Post by BobCat »

deleted
Retractable claws; the *original* concealed carry
User avatar

Topic author
VMI77
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 6096
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 5:49 pm
Location: Victoria, Texas

Re: City dwellers: "wealth-adjusted" community utopias comin

#5

Post by VMI77 »

anygunanywhere wrote:
VMI77 wrote:http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-06-1 ... ally-plan-
According to The Hill, the administration is moving forward with regulations designed to help diversify America’s wealthier neighborhoods, such as building affordable housing in more affluent areas.

The official title of Obama's latest proposal to have the government centrally-plan your community: The Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing rule, a name that only the person who penned the US Freedom Act could have come up with.

The underlying motive: "unfair" segregation sprinkled with a hint of latent racist guilt. "

A final Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) rule due out this month is aimed at ending decades of deep-rooted segregation around the country. “HUD is working with communities across the country to fulfill the promise of equal opportunity for all,” a HUD spokeswoman said. “The proposed policy seeks to break down barriers to access to opportunity in communities supported by HUD funds.”
"Wealthier" doesn't mean like where John Corrazine and his Wall Street pals hang out. But hey, maybe as anygun is fond of saying, the GOP will save you "rlol" .

Edited to add....this just in:
BREAKING: House Democrats delivered a stinging defeat to President Obama’s trade agenda when a vast majority voted to derail legislation designed help him advance a sweeping deal with 11 Pacific-rim nations.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/ ... story.html

I may have to start voting Democrat....they're more opposition for Obama than the GOP is. :smilelol5:
o

Does that mean that the progs have gone so far left they made the full circle and are back on the right?

The GOP will save us, won't they? John? Mitch?
Don't forget those snakes Rubio and Ryan.
"Journalism, n. A job for people who flunked out of STEM courses, enjoy making up stories, and have no detectable integrity or morals."

From the WeaponsMan blog, weaponsman.com
User avatar

Oldgringo
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 11203
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 10:15 pm
Location: Pineywoods of east Texas

Re: City dwellers: "wealth-adjusted" community utopias comin

#6

Post by Oldgringo »

Will these diverse "wealth-adjusted" comunities be like the development in McKinney where the neighborhood (and then some) swimming pool party made international news last week?

JSThane
Banned
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 610
Joined: Sun Sep 18, 2011 12:07 pm

Re: City dwellers: "wealth-adjusted" community utopias comin

#7

Post by JSThane »

I'm not sure it has anything to do with O's long-term agenda, though. I suspect the D's opposed it because they finally realized they're trading away ALL Congress' power in exchange for a handful of pennies from Barry, and they'd much rather grab the power back.

I'm not sure what McConnell, Boehner, and the aforementioned "snakes" are doing, though, unless they're so scared of being a majority party that they're attempting to throw power away as fast as they can, and if principles go out as well, them's the prices. The only alternative idea is that they're as socialist/communist as Zero, and that hardly bears thinking. Spineless and incompetent quislings are still a (little) better than outright traitors.
User avatar

rbwhatever1
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1434
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 7:16 pm
Location: Paradise Texas

Re: City dwellers: "wealth-adjusted" community utopias comin

#8

Post by rbwhatever1 »

Trying to turn the entire country into one big riot infested roach hotel...
III
User avatar

jmra
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 10371
Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2009 6:51 am
Location: Ellis County

Re: City dwellers: "wealth-adjusted" community utopias comin

#9

Post by jmra »

“This rule is not about forcing anyone to live anywhere they don’t want to,” said Margery Turner, senior vice president at the left-leaning Urban Institute. “It’s really about addressing long-standing practices that prevent people from living where they want to.”
where do I sign up for my free $10M mansion?
Life is tough, but it's tougher when you're stupid.
John Wayne
NRA Lifetime member
User avatar

Oldgringo
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 11203
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 10:15 pm
Location: Pineywoods of east Texas

Re: City dwellers: "wealth-adjusted" community utopias comin

#10

Post by Oldgringo »

jmra wrote:“This rule is not about forcing anyone to live anywhere they don’t want to,” said Margery Turner, senior vice president at the left-leaning Urban Institute. “It’s really about addressing long-standing practices that prevent people from living where they want to.”
where do I sign up for my free $10M mansion?
I'm not interested unless mine comes with a big yard....a really big fenced yard. :waiting:

Abraham
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 8400
Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2007 8:43 am

Re: City dwellers: "wealth-adjusted" community utopias comin

#11

Post by Abraham »

“It’s really about addressing long-standing practices that prevent people from living where they want to.”

If you don't make above average earnings, you can't "afford" to live in my neighborhood, but no one would prevent or try to prevent you from living in my neighborhood no matter your race, creed, blah, blah, etc....if you have the bucks.

Broke, make low wages, not motivated to do better, that's on you.

jason812
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1534
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2015 9:41 pm
Location: Central Texas

Re: City dwellers: "wealth-adjusted" community utopias comin

#12

Post by jason812 »

Another reason why I dont have neighbors closer than 1/4 mile and I only have 1. The freeloaders wont move to the middle of nowhere even if its free.
In certain extreme situations, the law is inadequate. In order to shame its inadequacy, it is necessary to act outside the law to pursue a natural justice.
User avatar

Topic author
VMI77
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 6096
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 5:49 pm
Location: Victoria, Texas

Re: City dwellers: "wealth-adjusted" community utopias comin

#13

Post by VMI77 »

JSThane wrote:I'm not sure it has anything to do with O's long-term agenda, though. I suspect the D's opposed it because they finally realized they're trading away ALL Congress' power in exchange for a handful of pennies from Barry, and they'd much rather grab the power back.

I'm not sure what McConnell, Boehner, and the aforementioned "snakes" are doing, though, unless they're so scared of being a majority party that they're attempting to throw power away as fast as they can, and if principles go out as well, them's the prices. The only alternative idea is that they're as socialist/communist as Zero, and that hardly bears thinking. Spineless and incompetent quislings are still a (little) better than outright traitors.
Oh, I'm prepared to believe the D vote was straight up political theater. Their turn at some pretend opposition, or just to highlight what a bunch of snakes we have in the national GOP. Either is more likely than the D's opposed it on principle.
"Journalism, n. A job for people who flunked out of STEM courses, enjoy making up stories, and have no detectable integrity or morals."

From the WeaponsMan blog, weaponsman.com
User avatar

The Annoyed Man
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 26796
Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 12:59 pm
Location: North Richland Hills, Texas
Contact:

Re: City dwellers: "wealth-adjusted" community utopias comin

#14

Post by The Annoyed Man »

If anyone is dumb enough to think that, by helping poor people buy "affordable housing" in Southlake, those same poor people will be able to afford Southlake's property tax rates, that person is dumber than a bag of hammers. Why? Because, Tarrant County's tax rates will be based on the assessed value of the home, not the federal government-subsidy the buyer used to help pay for it......and the county has the right to reassess that property's value up or down as it sees fit......and it never goes down.
“Hard times create strong men. Strong men create good times. Good times create weak men. And, weak men create hard times.”

― G. Michael Hopf, "Those Who Remain"

#TINVOWOOT
User avatar

Topic author
VMI77
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 4
Posts: 6096
Joined: Tue Jun 29, 2010 5:49 pm
Location: Victoria, Texas

Re: City dwellers: "wealth-adjusted" community utopias comin

#15

Post by VMI77 »

The Annoyed Man wrote:If anyone is dumb enough to think that, by helping poor people buy "affordable housing" in Southlake, those same poor people will be able to afford Southlake's property tax rates, that person is dumber than a bag of hammers. Why? Because, Tarrant County's tax rates will be based on the assessed value of the home, not the federal government-subsidy the buyer used to help pay for it......and the county has the right to reassess that property's value up or down as it sees fit......and it never goes down.
I don't think there is really going to be much buying as opposed to renting (although I suppose it's possible the rest of us will just have to pay their taxes and their mortgage). In any case, either the Section 8 crowd will be renters, and the rest of us will be paying, or they'll be buyers and the rest of us will still be paying. My guess is that if the program extends to buyers the government will be either subsidizing or paying the entire mortgage including property taxes and insurance.

Chicago was paying Section 8 renters up to $3,200 a month to rent upscale apartments, and recently lowered the payouts some due to a lot of negative publicity. In apartment complexes the incentive is an upfront 20% payday for the developers before a single paying renter appears. The flip-side is that In some cases in more upscale complexes the Section 8 payday has bankrupted the entire project because the Section 8 renters drove out most of the other paying occupants. Why pay your $3200 a month rent and your neighbor's rent and then have to put up with the same kind of neighbors and behavior you were paying the $3200 to escape from in the first place?

From comments I've read following various articles the current system has already destroyed numerous urban communities throughout the country and Texas. BTW, I don't know about assessments "never" going down. We sold a place in town and bought a place with acreage out in the country. The acreage assessment has increased about 800% since 2009, however, the homestead portion did actually decrease some over that period of time. Not that it matters much, since the taxes on the homestead are a very small portion of the total and that went up 50% over last year.

Conversely, the place we sold in town was assessed for some $45K more than what we could sell it for (mid 2014). The assessment went down to match the sales price, so the new owner got a few months at the reduced rate. Come 2015 though, the assessment went back up by $135K, so it didn't last long. Current taxes on the property are $8,000 per year, about $2,000 more than what we were paying before we sold. But you're right in the main....the overall trend isn't just up, but up in a steep near stall climb.
"Journalism, n. A job for people who flunked out of STEM courses, enjoy making up stories, and have no detectable integrity or morals."

From the WeaponsMan blog, weaponsman.com
Post Reply

Return to “Off-Topic”