ATF White Paper: Options to Reduce or Modify Firearms Regulations

Topics that do not fit anywhere else. Absolutely NO discussions of religion, race, or immigration!

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

Locked
User avatar

Topic author
remanifest
Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 185
Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2016 12:49 am
Location: San Antonio, TX
Contact:

ATF White Paper: Options to Reduce or Modify Firearms Regulations

#1

Post by remanifest »

Things are looking good, my friends - read it for yourself.
"They will not force us, and they will stop degrading us. They will not control us, and we will be victorious. Rise up and take the power back. We have to unify and watch our flag ascend."
- Muse - Uprising
User avatar

Beiruty
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 9655
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2008 9:22 pm
Location: Allen, Texas

Re: ATF White Paper: Options to Reduce or Modify Firearms Regulations

#2

Post by Beiruty »

Remove SBR and Noise suppressors fro NFA both at the same time.
What is dangerous about 10" barrel instead of 16" barrel?
Beiruty,
United we stand, dispersed we falter
2014: NRA Endowment lifetime member

Soccerdad1995
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 4337
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 8:03 pm

Re: ATF White Paper: Options to Reduce or Modify Firearms Regulations

#3

Post by Soccerdad1995 »

Beiruty wrote:Remove SBR and Noise suppressors fro NFA both at the same time.
What is dangerous about 10" barrel instead of 16" barrel?
:iagree:
User avatar

Beiruty
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 9655
Joined: Tue Aug 12, 2008 9:22 pm
Location: Allen, Texas

Re: ATF White Paper: Options to Reduce or Modify Firearms Regulations

#4

Post by Beiruty »

Soccerdad1995 wrote:
Beiruty wrote:Remove SBR and Noise suppressors fro NFA both at the same time.
What is dangerous about 10" barrel instead of 16" barrel?
:iagree:
If short barrel is more dangerous so are the pistols....
Beiruty,
United we stand, dispersed we falter
2014: NRA Endowment lifetime member

Soccerdad1995
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 4337
Joined: Mon Jan 04, 2016 8:03 pm

Re: ATF White Paper: Options to Reduce or Modify Firearms Regulations

#5

Post by Soccerdad1995 »

Beiruty wrote:
Soccerdad1995 wrote:
Beiruty wrote:Remove SBR and Noise suppressors fro NFA both at the same time.
What is dangerous about 10" barrel instead of 16" barrel?
:iagree:
If short barrel is more dangerous so are the pistols....
I was actually going to post the same thing. I guess my snub nose J frame should be classified as an assault weapon by this logic. There is nothing inherently dangerous about a long gun with a short barrel.
User avatar

bblhd672
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 4811
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:43 am
Location: TX

Re: ATF White Paper: Options to Reduce or Modify Firearms Regulations

#6

Post by bblhd672 »

Note the date of the paper? January 20, 2017, inauguration day for President Trump.
Does anyone think that paper would have been written and released had Hillary Clinton won the election?
The left lies about everything. Truth is a liberal value, and truth is a conservative value, but it has never been a left-wing value. People on the left say whatever advances their immediate agenda. Power is their moral lodestar; therefore, truth is always subservient to it. - Dennis Prager

jb2012
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1054
Joined: Thu Oct 15, 2015 1:12 pm

Re: ATF White Paper: Options to Reduce or Modify Firearms Regulations

#7

Post by jb2012 »

Now that is something I can get behind! :txflag: :patriot:

NotRPB
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1351
Joined: Tue May 05, 2015 8:24 am

Re: ATF White Paper: Options to Reduce or Modify Firearms Regulations

#8

Post by NotRPB »

Soccerdad1995 wrote:
Beiruty wrote:
Soccerdad1995 wrote:
Beiruty wrote:Remove SBR and Noise suppressors fro NFA both at the same time.
What is dangerous about 10" barrel instead of 16" barrel?
:iagree:
If short barrel is more dangerous so are the pistols....
I was actually going to post the same thing. I guess my snub nose J frame should be classified as an assault weapon by this logic. There is nothing inherently dangerous about a long gun with a short barrel.
Sure, but what if it was SO SHORT that it could be concealed, wouldn't that make it secret super duper double dangerous?
(Laughing because friend going to Arizona soon can open carry without license & heard reciprocity and now says he can open carry unlicensed, but can only carry concealed BECAUSE HE'S LICENSED so concealed must be more dangerous .... or something

twjones
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 242
Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2015 5:42 pm
Location: League City

Re: ATF White Paper: Options to Reduce or Modify Firearms Regulations

#9

Post by twjones »

I really hope SBRs get removed - I would likely build 2 immediately.
User avatar

Skiprr
Moderator
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 6458
Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 4:50 pm
Location: Outskirts of Houston

Re: ATF White Paper: Options to Reduce or Modify Firearms Regulations

#10

Post by Skiprr »

Folks, we currently have three different Topics discussing an identical subject: The recent ATF white paper and possible changes to certain NFA regulations. Unfortunately, the moderators didn't catch this duplication due largely to the fact that the Topics were started in different areas of the Forum.

We're going against typical practice here and not keeping the earliest Topic (although there is only one day separating the Topic start times), but rather the one that is in the most appropriate Forum area and that has the most replies.

Please visit this Topic to continue the discussion: "ATF White Paper discusses deregulating suppressors and arm braces" http://www.texaschlforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=94&t=87842.
Join the NRA or upgrade your membership today. Support the Texas Firearms Coalition and subscribe to the Podcast.
I’ve contacted my State Rep, Gary Elkins, about co-sponsoring HB560. Have you contacted your Rep?
NRA Benefactor Life Member
Locked

Return to “Off-Topic”