Suites vs buildings?

Topics that do not fit anywhere else. Absolutely NO discussions of religion, race, or immigration!

Moderators: carlson1, Charles L. Cotton

User avatar

Topic author
Grundy1133
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 7
Posts: 1110
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2018 2:18 pm
Location: Gainesville

Suites vs buildings?

#1

Post by Grundy1133 »

Where I live our post office is a suite attached to other suites. Like there's the post office at suite 1 and then there's a furniture store a dentist an optometrist and other various shoppes. My question is would the entire building be considered off limits since the post office is a "government building" or just the suite that the post office is in..? None of the enterances are connected to each other. There's not like a lobby with suites inside but each entrance leads to the outside sidewalk. I frequent a few of these places and it just now occurred to me that technically the post office is part of the strip of suites that make up this single building.
NRA Member

rotor
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 3326
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 11:26 pm

Re: Suites vs buildings?

#2

Post by rotor »

Also, what about the parking lot in the situation above?

Mike S
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 705
Joined: Sun Sep 06, 2015 5:08 pm
Contact:

Re: Suites vs buildings?

#3

Post by Mike S »

Only the property under the control of the USPS would be prohibited. The public parking lot & the remaining stores in this example, unless otherwise posted/ prohibited places, are good to go.

Tex1961
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1711
Joined: Mon Sep 18, 2017 5:11 am

Re: Suites vs buildings?

#4

Post by Tex1961 »

I couldn't see how it would be.. Only the premise space that they lease. Also its a shared parking lot... I'm not an attorney but I'd bet your fine.
User avatar

Topic author
Grundy1133
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 7
Posts: 1110
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2018 2:18 pm
Location: Gainesville

Re: Suites vs buildings?

#5

Post by Grundy1133 »

The post office is on the corner suite and has a reserved parking lot for them on the adjacent corner. The rest of the parking is parallel parking in front of the suites. Trying to get a picture
NRA Member
User avatar

Topic author
Grundy1133
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 7
Posts: 1110
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2018 2:18 pm
Location: Gainesville

Re: Suites vs buildings?

#6

Post by Grundy1133 »

I'm standing at the opposite end of the post office.
Image
NRA Member
User avatar

Topic author
Grundy1133
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 7
Posts: 1110
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2018 2:18 pm
Location: Gainesville

Re: Suites vs buildings?

#7

Post by Grundy1133 »

And also since the sidewalk is public could I use the side walk in front of the post office if I was just passing by? I ask because our instructor had told us any public sidewalk parking lot parking garage etc we can carry on but apparently that's not true. Lol
NRA Member
User avatar

Keith B
Moderator
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 18493
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 3:29 pm

Re: Suites vs buildings?

#8

Post by Keith B »

Grundy1133 wrote:And also since the sidewalk is public could I use the side walk in front of the post office if I was just passing by? I ask because our instructor had told us any public sidewalk parking lot parking garage etc we can carry on but apparently that's not true. Lol
You can carry on the property that is not owned/leased by the federal government. So, in this case, if it is an official Post Office or sub-station, then you can't carry inside or on the parking lot that is dedicated to the post office.

For a violation of Texas penal code 46 for weapons, which applies to other than federal property, the term 'premises' stated in the prohibited locations says
(3) "Premises" means a building or a portion of a building. The term does not include any public or private driveway, street, sidewalk or walkway, parking lot, parking garage, or other parking area.
Now, for 30.06/30.07 the penal code states 'property', which is all of the property posted with the sign that is under control of the owner. It does not include inside your vehicle in the parking lot.
Keith
Texas LTC Instructor, Missouri CCW Instructor, NRA Certified Pistol, Rifle, Shotgun Instructor and RSO, NRA Life Member

Psalm 82:3-4
User avatar

bblhd672
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 4811
Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2016 10:43 am
Location: TX

Re: Suites vs buildings?

#9

Post by bblhd672 »

After seeing the building in question on Google street view, the post office is located in the "Federal Building" which I believe means you cannot carry inside that building. But that doesn't mean the federal government owns the public sidewalk or the public streets in front of or beside, much less other buildings in the block. The parking lot in back has a sign that says "Postal Parking Only" so I would not park my car in there if I were carrying.
The left lies about everything. Truth is a liberal value, and truth is a conservative value, but it has never been a left-wing value. People on the left say whatever advances their immediate agenda. Power is their moral lodestar; therefore, truth is always subservient to it. - Dennis Prager

rotor
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 2
Posts: 3326
Joined: Tue Dec 18, 2012 11:26 pm

Re: Suites vs buildings?

#10

Post by rotor »

You can never be sure you are legal all the time. From the picture posted I really couldn't tell where the post office was so I can't comment. How many Texans park in a post office parking lot every day with a gun in their car? I certainly don't know. How many people have been prosecuted for parking in a post office parking lot with a gun in their car? I don't know but I am sure unless there is a drug deal going on, probably none. My post office doesn't even have a firearm warning on it. Not even a gun buster. Who would be the arresting officer for a post office violation. A federal marshal? Would a local cop ever be doing any law enforcement over a parking lot gun violation? I would certainly say don't push your luck on this issue. I wish that this GFZ would be eliminated.
User avatar

JustSomeOldGuy
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1406
Joined: Sat Dec 26, 2015 10:49 am

Re: Suites vs buildings?

#11

Post by JustSomeOldGuy »

Every PO I've been in has an 8 1/2" x 11" sheet of paper with a revolver shape on it citing Title 18 USC Section 930 somewhere in the building. And in 2 out of 3, it's somewhere that's not near the entry door........
member of the church of San Gabriel de Possenti
lay brother in the order of St. John Moses Browning
USPSA limited/single stack/revolver
User avatar

Topic author
Grundy1133
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 7
Posts: 1110
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2018 2:18 pm
Location: Gainesville

Re: Suites vs buildings?

#12

Post by Grundy1133 »

JustSomeOldGuy wrote:Every PO I've been in has an 8 1/2" x 11" sheet of paper with a revolver shape on it citing Title 18 USC Section 930 somewhere in the building. And in 2 out of 3, it's somewhere that's not near the entry door........
I know I cant go in the PO i was more curious about the other suites in the building because they're all technically linked together into 1 big building. but from what i've gathered, I can enter any suite that isn't being leased by the govt.
NRA Member
User avatar

jmorris
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 1531
Joined: Sat Mar 08, 2008 4:41 pm
Location: La Vernia
Contact:

Re: Suites vs buildings?

#13

Post by jmorris »

18 USC 930 only includes buildings, not parking lots.
(g) As used in this section:
(1) The term “Federal facility” means a building or part thereof owned or leased by the Federal Government, where Federal employees are regularly present for the purpose of performing their official duties.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/930

39 CFR 232.1 - Conduct on postal property.
(a)Applicability. This section applies to all real property under the charge and control of the Postal Service, to all tenant agencies, and to all persons entering in or on such property. This section shall be posted and kept posted at a conspicuous place on all such property.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/39/232.1

I would say that a city owned public sidewalk does not fall under control of the PO.
Jay E Morris,
Guardian Firearm Training, NRA Pistol, LTC < retired from all
NRA Lifetime, TSRA Lifetime
NRA Recruiter (link)
User avatar

RPBrown
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 1
Posts: 5025
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 11:56 am
Location: Irving, Texas

Re: Suites vs buildings?

#14

Post by RPBrown »

I have a similar situation in Irving and it involves the main PO. They lease a space in a strip shopping center and on the corner. They have 2 drive up post boxes in the parking lot. However, there is no designated parking for them or any of the businesses in the center and they have businesses next door to them. IANAL, but I feel as I can lawfully carry anywhere in the parking lot or adjacent stores (no 3.06 or 30.07) without repercussions. Now, if they were to convince the landlord or property owner to post the parking lot, I would be in violation.
NRA-Benefactor Life member
TSRA-Life member
Image
User avatar

Topic author
Grundy1133
Senior Member
Posts in topic: 7
Posts: 1110
Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2018 2:18 pm
Location: Gainesville

Re: Suites vs buildings?

#15

Post by Grundy1133 »

RPBrown wrote:I have a similar situation in Irving and it involves the main PO. They lease a space in a strip shopping center and on the corner. They have 2 drive up post boxes in the parking lot. However, there is no designated parking for them or any of the businesses in the center and they have businesses next door to them. IANAL, but I feel as I can lawfully carry anywhere in the parking lot or adjacent stores (no 3.06 or 30.07) without repercussions. Now, if they were to convince the landlord or property owner to post the parking lot, I would be in violation.
unless you stayed in your car right?
NRA Member
Post Reply

Return to “Off-Topic”