Hold on a minute.
Now I am just as disgusted with NJ laws as the next man, and have a strong affinity to the phrase "shall not be infringed".
But there is also the reality that if someone doesn't want to face arrests, attorney fees, trials and prison, it makes good sense to be aware of the laws actually being enforced and be smart about things.
Yes, he was engaged in interstate travel and had the benefit of FOPA "Safe Passage" provisions available to him.
However, FOPA requires the firearms to be in a trunk or compartment not immediately accessible from the vehicle, or, if you are in a vehicle like a station wagon or SUV that does not have a trunk,
they must be in a locked case.
I understand from related articles that I read from other forums that he had the zippered nylon cases that I am sure all of us have used at one time or another, and the cases were not locked.
Something similar in principle to:
There is a "plain sight" exception to needing a search warrant. If the cases had been locked, as required by federal law, I believe we would be looking at a different outcome.
This was one part that puzzled me:
A jury acquitted him of the charges for possession of the "assault firearms" and handgun possession but convicted him in absentia of illegal possession of hollow-point bullets, shotguns, rifles and a high-capacity magazine. He was apprehended in Texas and extradited to New Jersey.
Seriously? How is someone not present for a felony trial?