Possible bill of interest

Relevant bills filed and their status

Moderator: Charles L. Cotton


Topic author
srothstein
Senior Member
Posts: 3588
Joined: Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:27 pm
Location: Luling, TX

Possible bill of interest

Postby srothstein » Tue Nov 30, 2010 12:07 am

I don't know what is in the bill, but it looks like we need to pay attention. HB 356 was filed today (11-29-2010) by Rep. Burnam. The text is not available on line yet, but the bill is entitled "Relating to the recognition of a nonresident license to carry a concealed handgun."

Given our recent discussions and news events, I would guess that this bill makes it illegal for a Texas resident to carry with an out of state CHL. It is just a guess (and fear) since I have no knowledge of the bill other than the title. I will try to post again when the on-line registry gets the text.
Steve Rothstein

User avatar

carlson1
Senior Member
Posts: 7344
Joined: Sat Dec 03, 2005 1:11 am

Re: Possible bill of interest

Postby carlson1 » Tue Nov 30, 2010 12:13 am

It will be a bill with watching. I hope it is NOT a bill that would make it illegal for a Texas resident to carry on an out of State license.
Image

User avatar

seamusTX
Senior Member
Posts: 13540
Joined: Fri May 12, 2006 12:04 pm
Location: Galveston

Re: Possible bill of interest

Postby seamusTX » Tue Nov 30, 2010 12:17 am

With an F rating from the TSRA, it can't be welcome news. However, I would not expect it to see the light of day.

- Jim
Fear, anger, hatred, and greed. The devil's all-you-can-eat buffet.


RPB
Banned
Posts: 8697
Joined: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:17 pm

Re: Possible bill of interest

Postby RPB » Tue Nov 30, 2010 12:18 am

Thanks, I had forgotten to check today's filings, looks like several others might be interesting too

HB 348 Author: Walle
Last Action: 11/29/2010 H Filed
Caption: Relating to education and training for school district peace officers, school resource officers, and school security personnel employed by a school district.

HB 349 Author: Walle
Last Action: 11/29/2010 H Filed
Caption: Relating to requiring a school district to adopt a policy and collect data regarding restraints administered and citations issued by a school district peace officer.

HB 351 Author: Veasey
Last Action: 11/29/2010 H Filed
Caption: Relating to the expunction of records and files relating to a person's arrest.

HB 356 Author: Burnam
Last Action: 11/29/2010 H Filed
Caption: Relating to the recognition of a nonresident license to carry a concealed handgun.
I'm no lawyer

"Never show your hole card" "Always have something in reserve"

User avatar

baldeagle
Senior Member
Posts: 4654
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 8:26 pm
Location: Richardson, TX

Re: Possible bill of interest

Postby baldeagle » Tue Nov 30, 2010 12:29 am

Here's the link for when more information is available.

Doesn't look good. Burnam introduced an income tax in the last session - went nowhere. Big Bill White supporter, so probably anti-gun as well.
The Constitution preserves the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation where the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. James Madison
NRA Life Member Texas Firearms Coalition member


steve817
Senior Member
Posts: 543
Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 1:44 pm
Location: Arlington

Re: Possible bill of interest

Postby steve817 » Tue Nov 30, 2010 12:59 pm

Is this it?

A BILL TO BE ENTITLED

AN ACT
relating to the recognition of a nonresident license to carry a
concealed handgun.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
SECTION 1. Section 411.173, Government Code, is amended by
adding Subsection (b-1) to read as follows:
(b-1) Notwithstanding Subsection (b), a person's license
issued by another state may not be recognized in this state if the
person has established a domicile in this state. For purposes of
this subsection, "domicile" has the meaning assigned by Section
522.003, Transportation Code.

SECTION 2. This Act takes effect September 1, 2011.
"Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same.."
-- Ronald Reagan

User avatar

Keith B
Senior Member
Posts: 16200
Joined: Sat Aug 18, 2007 3:29 pm
Location: Plano, TX

Re: Possible bill of interest

Postby Keith B » Tue Nov 30, 2010 3:08 pm

That is it. This is what I have expected to see introduced due the ot he stink that was raised about Utah licenses being used to usurp the Texas resident license. Not a good bill for those who can't get a Texas resident license.
Keith
Texas CHL Instructor, NRA Life Member, NRA Certified Pistol Instructor and RSO

If it walks like a duck, and talks like a duck, you're drunk; Ducks don't talk.

User avatar

74novaman
Senior Member
Posts: 3596
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2009 7:36 am
Location: Temple, Republic of Texas
Contact:

Re: Possible bill of interest

Postby 74novaman » Tue Nov 30, 2010 9:45 pm

But....but.....the legislature is on our side! We were going to get campus carry, parking lots, open carry, constitutional carry passed and the GCA of 68 repealed this session!!! Theres no way that ANY anti gun bills are being drafted, right?





:evil2:
TANSTAAFL

User avatar

Charles L. Cotton
Site Admin
Posts: 14295
Joined: Wed Dec 22, 2004 9:31 pm
Location: Friendswood, TX
Contact:

Re: Possible bill of interest

Postby Charles L. Cotton » Wed Dec 01, 2010 2:11 pm

Keith B wrote:That is it. This is what I have expected to see introduced due the to he stink that was raised about Utah licenses being used to usurp the Texas resident license. Not a good bill for those who can't get a Texas resident license.


This is what we are facing because of the irresponsible advertising by two Utah instructors in Texas. This could have been easily avoided, but putting one's commercial interest ahead of Texas gun owners is always a bad plan. I wonder if those instructors bothered to tell their Utah students that a bill such as Burnam's was inevitable because of the bad publicity they were causing and that they may not be able to carry on their Utah CFP afterall? I suspect not.

This topic generated a lot of emotional discussion previously and I recommend that we not go down that path again; it won't help. We are now faced with fighting and defeating this bill. Emotional, saber-rattling, "kill them all and let God sort it our" arguments will be harmful, not helpful. There are two major weak points to this bill and one is the fact that it has been filed by arguably the most anti-gun Member of the Texas House of Representatives who has earned an "F" rating from the NRA and TSRA. Anyone who signs onto this Bill, votes favorably for it in committee, speaks in favor of it, or votes for it on the House Floor will be aligning themselves with the one of the most outspoken enemies of Texas gun owners. Pro-Second Amendment Republicans have enjoyed a huge victory at the polls just over a month ago and neither Rep. Burnam nor his HB356 represent the will of Texas gun owners who contributed greatly to that victory.

I will keep the second weakness of the Bill to myself at this point. There is no need to forewarn our opposition.

Chas.

User avatar

boba
Senior Member
Posts: 597
Joined: Sun Aug 01, 2010 1:28 pm

Re: Possible bill of interest

Postby boba » Wed Dec 01, 2010 5:40 pm

Is he also sponsoring a law to ban sports cars because of irresponsible advertising by manufacturers and dealers?

:biggrinjester:
IMMA CHARGIN MAH LAZER


Return to “2009 Texas Legislative Session”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest