Search found 5 matches

by Richard_B
Wed Jun 19, 2013 2:50 am
Forum: 2013 Texas Legislative Session
Topic: Special Session -- 2013
Replies: 106
Views: 43312

Re: Special Session -- 2013

superchief wrote:I am sure that Gov Perry is in favor of open carry and all the other issues we see as critical to our cause. Don't forget that he only has a limited amount of political capital, and just like us he has to pick his fights carefully. Politics is all about trading, and while he shares our beliefs, he can't be a single issue governor. He has other stuff he wants to get done and he has to use his legislative support carefully. That may sound like a cop out answer, but we are very well off on gun laws compared to other states, and we need solutions on a lot of other problems that need his attention.

I think if we ever could get the 1 million NRA members in Texas, then that would carry a lot of influence and focus our friends on keeping us happy.
I think you misunderstand what is involved.

In the House, Speaker Straus and Chairman Pickett bottled up a number of bills refusing to allow them to come to a vote either until sufficiently late in the session that they stood a lesser chance of making it through the system before the end of the session or simply refused to allow them to come to a vote in committee at all even though there were enough votes to pass them. If a bill were to come to the House from the Senate during a Special Session, the Speaker would not as easily kill it, though it is still possible that he could.

In the Senate, there are 19 Republicans out of 31 Senators. To get the 2/3rds majority necessary for a bill to be brought to the floor during the Regular Session, two Democrats would have had to have voted to bring it to the floor whether they voted for the bill or not. The Democratic Party of Texas more or less insisted that their people toe the party line on their anti-gun platform. In a Special Session of the Legislature, the 2/3rds rule does not apply an so a bill can be voted on and passed with a simple majority. There really isn't any political capital involved. The votes are there if the bills get a fair opportunity for a vote which is why the Governor's failure to include any second amendment issues at all in the call to the Legislature all the more disappointing.

Cheers
by Richard_B
Tue Jun 18, 2013 1:57 pm
Forum: 2013 Texas Legislative Session
Topic: Special Session -- 2013
Replies: 106
Views: 43312

Re: Special Session -- 2013

JKTex wrote:
Tic Tac wrote:A fair weather friend. That sums it up nicely.
No, it really doesn't. All these comments seem to be coming from frustration about a few of the bigger/more controversial bills and ignoring all the bills that have passed. The Governor has a machine to work within. If he could simply add and pass them I'm quite sure he would.

I know someone that is close to him but not from a political position and as "just a guy/friend/Dad" you' might be surprised how much he is on "our" side.

I'm hoping after this session though, Charles can share more insight that might help us understand the political wrangling and roadblocks. It's frustrating even if you understand there are reasons you won't understand or ever even know existed.
You contradict yourself, in part.

While it is true that the Governor can not pass legislation by himself, he can, in point of actual fact, "simply add" legislation to the call to the legislature for the special session. That is precisely what he has failed to do.

It is true that he has signed a number of bills which have "made it to his desk", but he has failed to go out of his way to be helpful by adding items to the call when doing so would have the effect of overcoming procedural hurdles to all the bill to be voted upon. The requirement in the Senate for a 2/3rds vote for any bill to get to the floor during the regular session is archaic. There is also the matter of House Speaker Straus which should require no further explanation.

Cheers
by Richard_B
Mon Jun 17, 2013 10:00 am
Forum: 2013 Texas Legislative Session
Topic: Special Session -- 2013
Replies: 106
Views: 43312

Re: Special Session -- 2013

TexasGal wrote:I do believe Perry has been, and is, supportive of the right to carry but I would like to know why he did not put campus carry in the Special Session. Considering how long we have been fighting for it, I would think he would have thrown a life preserver out for it in the form it had finally taken this session.
My assessment of Gov. Perry is that he simply will not go out of his way to help. He probably would not kill a bill if it passes, but that is about it. ("I'll sign it if it makes it to my desk" comes to mind.)

He is like a "friend" who won't be seen in public with you...not much of a friend and certainly not one who has your back.

Sure, "it could be worse", but....

I find it interesting that the Gov. Is out of state recruiting firearms businesses, but he won't stand up for gun rights, or more precisely the rights of citizens to use guns. I don't think the two positions are entirely consistent, but "it could be worse". Still, we should hope for better.
by Richard_B
Thu Jun 13, 2013 9:35 am
Forum: 2013 Texas Legislative Session
Topic: Special Session -- 2013
Replies: 106
Views: 43312

Re: Special Session -- 2013

paperchunker wrote:This was the last chance for Perry and Dewhurst in my book. It is time to really get behind Greg Abbott for Governor and Jerry Patterson for Lt. Governor in 2014.
You may be surprised to learn that Speaker Straus (R-San Antonio) is "A" rated by NRA-ILA. Rep. Joe Pickett (D-El Paso), Chairman of the Homeland Security and Public Safety Committee is likewise "A" rated.

How would you have rated these individuals based upon their actions in the last three regular sessions?

Soon, I think, it will be time to evaluate the methods and results of ILA's evaluation of candidates.

You may wish to make your own assessment of the matter.
by Richard_B
Wed Jun 05, 2013 3:44 pm
Forum: 2013 Texas Legislative Session
Topic: Special Session -- 2013
Replies: 106
Views: 43312

Re: Special Session -- 2013

I find it interesting that various legislators are even allowed to file bills that are not on the call. I don't know that the practice is permissible or an authorized expenditure of state funds in doing so. The legislature is supposed to be working on what the Governor transmitted when he called the legislature into session, but then again when did such details bother the lege?

Return to “Special Session -- 2013”