Victory, it sounds like you're suggesting something that violates Forum Rule #4.victory wrote:It still works in many schools, stadiums and saloons.gdanaher wrote:Humm.
It used to be that concealed meant concealed.
Search found 2 matches
Return to “Cinemark vs AMC theaters”
- Wed Aug 06, 2014 1:56 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Cinemark vs AMC theaters
- Replies: 38
- Views: 10782
Re: Cinemark vs AMC theaters
- Wed Aug 06, 2014 1:53 pm
- Forum: General Texas CHL Discussion
- Topic: Cinemark vs AMC theaters
- Replies: 38
- Views: 10782
Re: Cinemark vs AMC theaters
Gosh, it seems like there are a lot of splitting hairs around here.
I think I"m hearing one person say, "Because one business appears to have tried to put up a 30.06-ish looking sign that may or may not be valid, may or may not be of the right size, and/or may or may not have a contrasting background, they prefer not to go there. Instead, they prefer to visit another business that doesn't make such attempt at all, and avoids any instance of a sign that appears to try to meet the possible intention of the 30.06 sign, irrespective of the legality or illegality, or enforceability or lack of enforceability, or any other modifier in the English language that may or may not be chosen."
There...does that have sufficient enough wiggle words included to stop the incessant wordsmithing? Why is it that we are attacking each other's intent, just because the wording is not as exact and precise and scientifically / legally accurate as the wording that you would have chosen?
Anybody (except a lawyer doing what they do best in the courtroom) understands the intent of what the previous poster was saying. All the incessant bickering over what language that should have been used (on this friendly forum) to describe the sign hanging theater is quite a downer.
I think I"m hearing one person say, "Because one business appears to have tried to put up a 30.06-ish looking sign that may or may not be valid, may or may not be of the right size, and/or may or may not have a contrasting background, they prefer not to go there. Instead, they prefer to visit another business that doesn't make such attempt at all, and avoids any instance of a sign that appears to try to meet the possible intention of the 30.06 sign, irrespective of the legality or illegality, or enforceability or lack of enforceability, or any other modifier in the English language that may or may not be chosen."
There...does that have sufficient enough wiggle words included to stop the incessant wordsmithing? Why is it that we are attacking each other's intent, just because the wording is not as exact and precise and scientifically / legally accurate as the wording that you would have chosen?
Anybody (except a lawyer doing what they do best in the courtroom) understands the intent of what the previous poster was saying. All the incessant bickering over what language that should have been used (on this friendly forum) to describe the sign hanging theater is quite a downer.