TexasCHLforum.com

Without much info, whay I understand is all that this "ruling" does is tell the parties that the supreme court will not hear the appeal of a ruling to throw out rhe case. It could very well be the SCOTUS wants to hear the case itself and rule on the validity/constitutionality of the law itself. Another option is that they felt this matter was less important than matters like can transgender albino birds with a disability that trigger a camera own the copyright to the image...