Search found 2 matches

by CleverNickname
Sat May 30, 2015 5:37 pm
Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
Topic: HB 910 Conference Committee
Replies: 518
Views: 119916

Re: HB 910 Conference Committee

anygunanywhere wrote:
mojo84 wrote:
RetNavy wrote:
ScooterSissy wrote:
Charles L. Cotton wrote:
The Wall wrote:What if the person entering the premises is blind? Shouldn't these signs also be in Braille?
Now there's an idea for 2017! The MOMS will be going crazy, crazier than they are, that is.

Chas.
I'm pro 2A, obviously, and really don't want to discriminate against anyone ... but a blind shooter?? C'mon...

I remember laughing hard when I saw an elevator that had the federally mandated braille numbers and wording on it's signage. It was funny because it was a parking garage elevator; but hey, rules is rules...


cant be any different than the braille keypads on drive thru atm's
That is something that has always puzzled me.
Braille on drive through ATMs are a prime example of the link between political correctness and stupid governments.
I'm guessing it's probably less expensive and more convenient for ATM manufacturers to make/use one model of ATM keypad than make two models, one for drive-up ATMs and one for walk-up. It's not significantly more difficult or expensive to put a few little bumps on a plastic injection molded part than to leave them off. I guess if a blind person was in the car's back seat behind the driver they could use a drive-up ATM from inside a car, too.
by CleverNickname
Fri May 29, 2015 11:08 pm
Forum: 2015 Legislative Session
Topic: HB 910 Conference Committee
Replies: 518
Views: 119916

Re: HB 910 Conference Committee

v7a wrote:This is the 30.06 language change:

[ Image ]
So on Jan 1, every current 30.06 sign becomes non-compliant because they're not using the new language?

Return to “HB 910 Conference Committee”