Chas.,Charles L. Cotton wrote:Yes. Thanks for asking.The Wall wrote:Charles, can I use your part in red as a quote?Charles L. Cotton wrote:
Yes to both questions. Gun owners won before a three-judge panel, but the City asked for and received an en banc hearing. Heller and McDonald are still good law, for now, but neither case dealt with "bearing" arms outside the home. This decision is wrong, but it does not conflict with either SCOTUS case at this point.
Make no mistake, if Hillary wins, the Heller decision will be overturned and the Second Amendment will be rendered meaningless. The never-Trump crowd needs to fully understand this. There are no alternatives, there are no counter-arguments and there is no justification for doing anything that allows Clinton to occupy the White House.
Chas.
Chas.
Is this an open ok to use the quote as is with attribution or a one off permission to the request. I'd like to use the quote. It is relevant, concise, cohesive and complete!