Doesn't surprise me at all. This is exactly what I expected.C-dub wrote: ↑Mon Jul 30, 2018 9:57 pm http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/07/30/mo ... -says.html
This may not be the correct sub-forum, but here it goes.
I'm all for people that shouldn't have guns not having guns, but this disturbs me. How can every one that got filed be worthy of taking away someone's right. I know it doesn't indicate whether or not they were returned after further investigation or after some period of time or anything. Not even those famed secretive FISA warrants, which were reportedly mostly rubber stamped, had every one approved.Every petition filed under the order in Pinellas County has so far been granted by the judge, according to the report.
Anyone else hear about or see this?
Nothing in this article describes why anyone had theirs confiscated other than because they didn't surrendered them voluntarily.
No judge wants to be the first to DENY a confiscation order, and then that gun-owner be the one-in-a-million (one-in-a-billion?) who does go out and do something stupid. Yes, it's much easier and much safer to just rubber stamp the order and move on.