TexasCHLforum.com

It's a MAD MAD MAD WORLD! People have lost their minds!

TxRVer wrote: ↑Mon Jun 15, 2020 2:35 pm That sounds like something CA would do...even though it was never a slave state.

Don't Confuse them with the Facts!

philip964 wrote: ↑Sun Dec 29, 2019 12:13 am https://www.kron4.com/news/california/c ... -law-says/

New CA law no suspension for disobeying teachers.

They just put a target on those teachers backs!

TreyHouston wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 3:13 pm

narcissist wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 2:33 pm

WTR wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2019 1:45 pm Got me. However, we need to build a wall around TX. I’ve seen the results from Colorado.

Good idea, maybe have two walls with Land mines in between the two while it being electri-fied. Maybe some remotely operated mini guns every 200-300yds or so with thermal detection to shoot anything that gets in between the walls. Aw may be a little to excessive?

You forgot the Alligators, you must have alligators at the wall- Trump.

Alligators are too slow, hyenas would work, hyenas will start to eat before the prey is dead!

philip964 wrote: ↑Tue Aug 27, 2019 12:31 pm https://www.kcra.com/article/raging-wat ... e/28810491

40 person brawl over a towel at CA water park. One man nearly died.

This reminds me of an incident at Parks Mall several years backl, me and a good friend of mine were there shopping and we are up on the second floor when we heard loud yelling of an argument, two women on the ground floor were in each other's face, suddenly one slaps the other in the face and they start to fight, then what appeared to be total strangers join in and it becomes a brawl! I looked at my friend and said we are leaving NOW! Last I saw about 20 people in a general fight, I believe the term riot would have been appropriate!

Does it define "Necessary" ?
Like you can't use deadly force unless deadly force as been applied by the suspect? I get the feeling this will either A. Get a LEO killed or B. Get a LEO prosecuted

philip964 wrote: ↑Sun Aug 18, 2019 9:40 am https://www.wsj.com/articles/california ... 1565994160

defecation crisis.

Cholera, typhoid?
Rats= bubonic plague
Just a matter of time!

Coal mostly, nuclear too, but it's okay if we do it!

kayt00 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 17, 2019 4:23 pm

philip964 wrote: ↑Wed Jul 17, 2019 3:42 pm https://www.sfgate.com/bayarea/article/ ... 39d0f200&f?

Berkeley becomes the first US city to ban natural gas in new homes.

I wonder how they make their electricity in CA. Nuke, coal, solar, geothermal or do they primarily use natural gas?

I know that there was at least one Nuke operated by PG&E not far from where I grew up on the coast.

Because they gave in to the environmental wackos and didn't build power plants when they should have, they buy alot of Electricity from Texas!

Just wait until cholera, typhus, bubonic plague breakout, or God Forbid Ebola!

stever1950 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 09, 2019 3:07 pm Do you know what happened 169 years ago this fall....back in 1850?
California became a state
The people had no electricity.
The state had no money.
Almost everyone spoke Spanish.
There were gunfights in the streets.
So basically nothing has changed except the women had real breasts and the men didn't hold hands.

Raufoss rounds do bad things to circuit boards!

Back to the lawsuit. I don't believe that such a case is limited to Commiefornia

In the late 90s, I was picked from a jury pool to hear a civil case in Ft. Worth. The Plaintiff had slipped on a quarter sized piece of melon rind on a shopping cart ramp at a supermarket on a busy Friday night, injuring her back. Her lawyer claimed that she was due damages for medical bills plus pain and suffering but never brought up an amount ($50K) until closing arguments
1. Her husband had walked over the same area a few seconds before she did and told her to watch her step
2. The store only sold melons whole - no evidence was presented as to how the melon had gotten from a whole state to the small piece as part of the store's suggested negligence
3. The woman claimed that her back problem was entirely due to her fall but had a history of other doctors who treated her for back problems including giving her a "tens" unit. She had gone to a different doctor for this trial.

The trial lasted 3.5 days so there was a lot of emotional testimony about the woman's condition. When the jury retired to deliberate, we took an initial poll and more than half of anonymous ballots were for giving her money. I told them I would gladly go along with a cash award - as long as we could give the store's money to 100 patients at John Peter Smith hospital, too. I refused to budge off that stance until they proved to me why she deserved the money more than the JPS patients did. In less than 2 hours later, we presented a unanimous verdict for the defendant - no monetary award. The judge, assuming that the deliberations were going to be lengthy, had gone home so another judge was called in to preside over the jury verdict.

Needless to say, I've never served on a civil jury since. [/quote]